Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (207253)	10/18/2004 9:42:31 AM
From: Elroy	Respond to of 1575396

>> Do you really doubt the above sentence? Yes. If the Bush administration did not filter available intelligence in making the case for WMDs in Iraq, why is there zero mention in their pitch about the intelligence supporting the counter point case (no WMDs in Iraq)? Surely, there must have been some countering evidence, and if there were no filter it would have appeared. Any explanation for that? If no explanation, there either MUST have been Bush administration filtering, or there was ZERO evidence in 12 years of gathering supporting the idea that Saddam had none. Hard to believe there was ZERO evidence that was, uhmmmmm, correct......