SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : John Kerry for President? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (2540)10/19/2004 4:01:08 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3515
 
KERRY'S COALITION QUAGMIRE (LIBERAL WASHINGTON DISPATCH SLAPS JOHN KERRY!)

A question that has been asked implicitly of John Kerry's possible Presidency (and which some commentator should have the nerve and good journalistic sense to ask directly to the candidate), is this: "Mr. Kerry, if you are elected President of the United States, what are you going to say when you're face-to-face with Italy's Sylio Berlusconi, Britain's Tony Blair, Poland's Aleksander Krasniewski, Australia's John Howard, and about 40 other heads of state of the members of the current U.S. coalition of nations supporting the military action in Iraq?"

Perhaps your thinking is that you'll just ignore them and court favor with America's "real" allies, France, Germany, and Russia. Because, let's face it, while you have asserted on several occasions you'd build a "real" coalition, the fact is that there are serious questions as to how well you could represent American diplomatic interests — let's forego for the moment any discussion of our security interests — given your ill-considered, impertinent, even downright insulting remarks about nations that actually do recognize the value of countering states that perpetrate terrorism and harbor terrorists in the only way that has proven even remotely effective; that is, through the use of force.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtondispatch.com ...



To: American Spirit who wrote (2540)10/19/2004 5:39:23 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3515
 
Sorry, vague unsubstantiated assertions are not a coherent argument. Try being more specific and then backing up your assertions with evidence.