Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geode00 who wrote (30596)	10/19/2004 4:45:55 PM
From: JeffA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

At the risk of confusing you, or inciting another of your weird rants, had Clinton simply owned up to what he did, it would have passed without a ripple in tidal wave of support he had. It would have been no biggie to his supporters. Personally, what he did was reprehensible. What O'Reilly did is a lot less important than what Clinton did. Further, I consider O'reilly much closer to a private citizen than Clinton. You are really skating on thin ice here. Actually, you have moved over to nothing supporting you. With your unabashed support for Clinton and his "private" exploits with a young girl, you have zero room to comment on O'reilly. None. As far as my morals and ethics, you are wholly unqualified to comment, but I know that won't stop you from running your mouth.