Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (207684)	10/20/2004 3:59:43 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574179

it's gonna break the momentum of the war on terror What war? I think you are referring to the US government's efforts to improve national security, right?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (207684)	10/20/2004 6:48:39 AM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574179

tell us the story again about Israeli agents flying the hijacked airplanes on 9/11.....

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (207684)	10/20/2004 1:45:07 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1574179

Re: And if Kerry wins? What does that do to your theory? Well, a Kerry victory will take the wind out of the war party's sails... it's gonna break the momentum of the war on terror... so much so that the 911 conspirators might deem it necessary to kickstart the whole thing --and that's a scary prospect. I mean, a Kerry victory will likely be followed by another terrorist attack --a terrorist "correction" to remind President Kerry of his duty to keep the anti-terrorist ball rolling.... It looks to me like you underestimate the Kerry side of the equation. As for the terrorists, they already are planning their next attack and no matter which party wins, its likely they will be able to pull it off. Fortunately for us, it takes them years and major money to make something happen. You see the big question hovering before us is not what are the differences between two men and two parties, but rather are we willing to continue to be a democracy in the face of risking more terrorist attacks. Its the difference between two ways of life. Its been over three years since 9/11 and the Bush administration has yet to make American airports safe, and they are the least of this nation's porosity. We are too big to not be porous. So.........are we willing to remain a free society inspite of the inherent danger??? That is the million dollar question. If left to the GOP and the South, the answer ultimately would probably be a no. For the rest, we will fight to the bitter end to keep our freedoms. That's what's at stake here. And like I said in a prior post, the rest of us will not go quietly into the nite over this issue. ted