SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (148331)10/20/2004 2:23:55 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Let me ask you something. Do you think that the NAACP has the right to reserve the position of national director to an African- American? Do you think that the Girl Scouts have the right to hire only women for camp counselors? Do you think that there is ever rational discrimination based on the character of the organization or the particularities of the job?



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (148331)10/20/2004 7:37:17 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
OT

Absolutely. No question. If a church is not willing to abide by public law, it should not accept public money. Or other public benefits, such as tax exemption, which is effectively a subsidy.

I maybe could agree about the public funds, but not about the tax exception. Removing the tax exemption would actually be reducing the separation of church and state as it would be getting the state much more involved in the church's business, esp with the complex and inventive ladden tax codes we have today. The power to tax is the power to destroy.

Tim