Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cherrypitter who wrote (35939)	10/21/2004 5:58:35 PM
From: Dennis Roth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206131

>> Even then 1.9 bcf/day will not satiate both Canada and U.S. gas needs. << Richard, I'm not expecting the The Mackenzie project or the Alaska pipeline or LNG or any one project by itself to fix the gas problem. I'm looking for a way to make a buck. That's what motivates me to follow such developments. It will effect the value of my investments in Imperial Oil, TransCanada, and Suncor which needs gas for its oil sands production. No gas, no oil sands production or heavy oil production from Cold Lake. I'm sure that once these mega-projects get going there will be other ways to make some money from the steel demand, pipe fabricators, construction firms etcetera. >> unless First Nation guy speaks with forked tongue << He was quoted in the Globe and Mail today making hopeful noises. theglobeandmail.com And he said a settlement is close at hand -- a move that would allow the Deh Cho and the federal government to pursue a land-claims agreement, and the oil companies backing the pipeline to continue to push ahead with the regulatory phase of their project. "All three bodies can taste an agreement, they can smell it in the air," he said. Of course, if it helps solve the continent's energy crisis while making me a buck, that would be good too.