To: Sully- who wrote (19254 ) 10/22/2004 9:51:53 PM From: cirrus Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947 The problem with Duelfer's assumptions is that they fail to separate Saddam's objectives from Saddam's realities: Norman Schwarzkopf said of Saddam:As far as Saddam Hussein being a great military strategist, he is neither a strategist, nor is he schooled in the operational arts, nor is he a tactician, nor is he a general, nor is he a soldier. Other than that, he's a great military man. I want you to know that. brainyquote.com Saddam possessed and used WMD during the Iran/Iraq war. To what effect? A bloddy eight year war that ended in a stalemate. Saddam possessed WMD during the US/Iraq conflict known as Gulf War I. He also possessed at the time the world's fourth largest standing army equipped with a wide variety of weapons and a formidable air defense system. The result: a ground war that was over in 100 hours. Yes, Saddam could have rebuilt his arsenal and military after sanctions were lifted. Then what? A military based on fear and bribery is not to be feared. Who can forget the images of the thousands of Iraqi troops surrendering during Gulf War I and their many explanations for refusing to fight? With respect to WMD... even if Saddam did reconstitute these programs, as Duelfer believes he intended, what would he do with them? Any use of WMD against the US or Israel by Iraq or Iraqi surregates would have ment the end of Saddam's regime. Saddam could have used WMD against Israel or the US during Gulf War I, but did not. Why? Because 1) chemical and biological weapons are generally ineffective battlefield weapons and 2) use of such weapons would have caused the US to end Saddam's regime. Saddam was a survivor, not a suicidal terrorist. The Duelfer report is important and addresses many important issues, but he fails to incorporate some important historical realities into his projections.