SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (13244)10/22/2004 10:49:13 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 20773
 
Too few stemcells?? <Attack the source, ignore the topic.>

Btw, another well definited dilemma is the FLynn Effect.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (13244)10/23/2004 5:20:05 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
I attack both.

Do me a favor- find the exact places in the report you think supports the extreme danger Iraq posed to us (danger that would justify an invasion and occuaption). When you have found those items, let me know- please give me the portion of the report and I'll look at them again. I've looked at the report, and seen NOTHING that justifies what we've done- and I said at the outset of our misadventure in Iraq, that if WMD's were found, or a link to Al Q- I'd say I was wrong about everything I said (that there were no WMD's and that there would be no link to Al Q- how did I figure that out? logic. Could I have been wrong - sure. Was I? No.)

Since you assert there is really superb evidence to show that Iraq was big heap dangerous, bring it on. If you can't, I shall assume that's because the evidence really isn't there. I found the Duelfer report a real eye opener- I especially like the way evidence was gathered- there's nothing in writing on the programs, it's "testimomy"- from people hoping to save their skins by cooperating- and the best we could get from those people? Nothing that makes your case, and quite a bit that makes mine.

Enjoy your reading.