Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (20630)	10/25/2004 8:02:11 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

I see you love conspiracy theories - my theory is that Clinton Gore and other Democrats were involved. Clinton needed to cover his legal expenses and therefore he bought most of the puts on the US airlines by having knowledge of the events further the disaster would enhance Hillary position as a NY Senator. It was all dreamed up by the Democratic party. Democratic activists with in our armed forces and intelligence gathering institution blocked the flow of information hoping for the downfall of the republican administration which was nominated by the US Supreme Court and not by a majority vote If you disagree please show me the proof that contradicts what I wrote ----------------------------------------------------- Some time I wonder how much BS you can post related to this tragedy ...... why any American in his right mind will "allow it" is beyond me are you really of the opinion that Bush knowingly let it happen ? it sound quite sick to me....... it is about time to get real. All I can say is that there were warnings relayed to the US from Europe & Israel and possible other sources, but the US failed to act properly upon those warnings or conclude a specific treat ….. it was nothing new as they already knew of a plan to down wide body airliners over the Pacific from the guy arrested under Clinton administration in the Philippines

To: mishedlo who wrote (20630)	10/25/2004 8:57:27 AM
From: glenn_a	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 110194

Mish. Thanks for the alternative view on the Pentagon crash. Just to clarify re: the Pentagon crash is not whether a plane flew into the Pentagon, but rather whether a 757 flew into the Pentagon, a plane weighing 80 tons. I do appreciate the alternative case. I think there is an attraction (or repulsion) to "conspiracy theories" that can make them very emotional arguments where evidence is "massaged" to fit one's preexisting point of view. For me, the most surreal thing is that a passenger plane could ever fly into the Pentagon in the first place, particularly when the US military and airspace would have been on high alert as it was approx 50 minutes after the first plane flew into the World Trade Centers. Just too incredible for my skeptical mind. But, that's just me. Re: the crash remains, it does not look to me like the crash site of a 757. But, I'm not expert on the matter. Regards, Glenn