To: Suma who wrote (19369 ) 10/26/2004 3:22:26 AM From: Sully- Respond to of 90947 Suma, we both speak English, but many of the words we both use have starkly different meanings. Your own words in italics."You certainly don't need me to supply favorable information on the President." What I actually said.... "I have yet to hear you express any change of opinion whatsoever about President Bush when all of these "dirty tricks" against Bush turned out to be democratic sponsored smear jobs.""What I present are the FACTS." ... Funny, but when I reply to your so-called "facts" have you not noticed that I link you to real facts from credible sources that clearly establish that what you thought were "facts" were lies, smear jobs, rumor & baseless opinions from partisan political hacks? If you think I am wrong about this show me where I have failed to do this. (see links below)"God forbid this site becomes like Politics for Pros where everyone THINKS ALIKE, BELIEVES alike and if anyone dissents he is banned" Uh oh! I guess those are "facts". I read that thread & know that what you believe to be true is total bunk. Perhaps you can link me to some evidence to support your POV? When you do, I'll link you to genuine evidence that establishes you are wrong."Now, I don't expect you to change your mind, Westerea as you are one of the more adamant that Bush can do no wrong" Got proof, or is your severely flawed opinion doubling as your "facts"? Link me to just one instance where I said anything remotely close to your false assertion. RE: Bush "I find that the cover ups ( he did not want the 9/11 commission and avoided it as long as he could ) and secrecy.. we aren't allowed to see the flag draped coffins of the men who died..........." Prove it. And not from the DNC, Team Kerry or Michael Moore. Try a credible source with real evidence."AND I have looked into the report by Duelfer or whatever his name is. AND what I learned was that the U.N. Inspections committee always knew that there was a chance of Saddam rearming (they knew he had nothing at the time of the inspections ) and what Mr. Deulfer left out of his report was that they expected to continue to monitor the situation." What? Link me to some real evidence that supports this bunk. In the mean time read these articles........dev.siliconinvestor.com dev.siliconinvestor.com And these replies to your posts.......dev.siliconinvestor.com dev.siliconinvestor.com dev.siliconinvestor.com dev.siliconinvestor.com dev.siliconinvestor.com dev.siliconinvestor.com dev.siliconinvestor.com dev.siliconinvestor.com