Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Watkins who wrote (148964)	10/25/2004 5:17:59 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Man, your selective memory lays all to rest. If any US company, ever, desired to work with the only government of Iraq, why, naturally, that is the US being "in cahoots" with Saddam and thus is the only responsible party for his crimes. Well if we're going to be responsibile for Saddams crimes, I guess that makes us responsible for getting rid of him too - you did want to get rid of him, didn't you? So why were you so unhappy when the US got rid of him? You seem to like the US to be friends with dictators so that you can rail at the US (never the dictators) without confusion. If we ever had any intention of seizing the Iraqi oil we would have done it by now. We didn't do it.