Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Watkins who wrote (149045)	10/26/2004 11:25:24 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

When you read the actual transcript of the interview it becomes quite clear that much of what Kamel describes to his interviewers was already known by UNSCOM. In dozens of questions, Kamel is shown to reconfirm what UNSCOM knew That may be UNSCOM's opinion, but it was decidedly not the opinion of other analysts, such as Ken Pollack. Remember, UNSCOM, had a great embarrassment to cover up, as this stuff had been hidden from them. As for Saddam being "contained", what kind of "contained" is it when your own army and the rest of the world is convinced that you have WMD? That is contained? And Lord still knows what he actually had, since we gave him a year to prepare and we know the convoys of trucks went to Syria, hauling who knows what. We only know that he didn't have it - or got rid of what he did have - because we conquered the country. That is not contained.