SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (208661)10/26/2004 9:50:56 AM
From: Elroy  Respond to of 1573850
 
David, do you truly believe this? How so?

I do. I find Gore and Kerry to be great salesmen. But neither impresses me intellectually. Neither is a Bill Clinton.


Sounds like you prefer the strong, silent-unless-scripted type!



To: i-node who wrote (208661)10/26/2004 12:05:02 PM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 1573850
 
States See Federal Largesse as Election Nears

29 minutes ago Politics - Reuters


By Charles Abbott

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Whether as loan guarantees for a shop in Ohio or a grant for a Florida power plant, the Bush administration is showering hundreds of millions of dollars in federal money on toss-up states in the presidential election.



Officials insist the largesse is not tied to the campaign. But the grants are generally announced by top agency officials during local appearances, assuring attention in pivotal areas, and they have come thick and fast as Nov. 2 approaches.

Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham (news - web sites), for example, went to Orlando, Florida, last week to announce a $235 million grant to help build a clean-burning power plant. The project "will account for more than 1,800 jobs," he said.

Other recent awards were $46.7 million for light rail in the Pittsburgh area, $17.9 million to reduce aircraft noise at the Reno, Nevada, airport, $36,500 for a fire truck and ambulance in Minnesota, and $4.5 million in guarantees for a convenience store near Cleveland.

Florida, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Nevada and Ohio are presidential battleground states. With Wisconsin, Iowa, New Mexico, West Virginia, Missouri, they are expected to decide the Nov. 2 election for either President Bush (news - web sites) or Democratic challenger Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites).

"This is a technique that has been used for many, many years," said David Williams of Citizens Against Government Waste, referring to the ballyhooing of local awards.

"One of the good things that happened this year," he said, to hold down questionable outlays, was that Congress has yet to approve funding for most parts of the government.

SOME CALL IT PORK

The spending bills often earmark money for local projects and provide fodder for attack by good-government groups that object to "pork," or excessive spending on local projects in return for political support. "That is a lot better hidden in agency budgets," said Williams.

Budget watchdog Taxpayers for Common Sense said the $140 billion corporate tax bill enacted by Congress this month, the biggest corporate tax overhaul in the United States in two decades, was filled with giveaways intended "to bribe swing states."

The tax bill extended the fuel tax break for corn-derived ethanol, a popular political cause in the Midwest, and created a similar credit for biodiesel, most often made from soybeans.

Earlier this month, Congress rushed to approve $14.5 billion in hurricane aid, mostly earmarked for Florida, which had been hit repeatedly by major storms. The money was attached to an unrelated bill funding military construction.

The Transportation Department has awarded more than $200 million in grants and other investments in swing states since July. Transportation Secretary Norm Mineta, the sole Democrat in Bush's Cabinet, was in Ohio last week to announce $82 million toward construction of a rapid transit project in the Cleveland area.

"We give out grants all year long every year. It's one of the main things this department does," said Robert Johnson, spokesman for Mineta. "It doesn't matter what's going on beyond these walls."

The department, then run by Democrats, also handed out large checks in 2000. One grant awarded before the election gave $230 million to California airport and transit programs.

Also this week, the Agriculture Department announced a project with Ohio to pay farmers and landowners up to $207 million over 15 years to plant erosion-reducing grasses and trees to protect water quality for Columbus, the state capital.

(Additional reporting by John Crawley)



To: i-node who wrote (208661)10/26/2004 4:39:15 PM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573850
 
David,RE: "I think it would just be viewed as offensive to those on the Left with no real purpose in doing so."

I understand. How about expressing your thoughts on why you believe Bush is an intellectual, without making a comparison to any Democratic. This way, I learn what you're thinking. I'm still genuinely curious.

He doesn't talk much, and when he does, it's rather simple one line sentences which gives an impression he doesn't think in terms of complex problem solving. I had the impression Fox network views intellectuals in a negative light based upon a rather negative generalization they made about "intellectuals are weird" and "too much intelligence." It's my impression some conservatives embrace a disklike of intellectuals and some writers on Fox are even proud of disliking them, so I had thought that Bush not being an intellectual was considered a plus and was consistent to their dislike of intellectuals.

What characteristics do you feel are signs of intellectualism?

This question is purely out of curiosity.

Regards,
Amy J