SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KyrosL who wrote (80836)10/26/2004 10:04:43 AM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 793843
 
Why bother "drawing a conclusion" when you can rely on facts?



To: KyrosL who wrote (80836)10/26/2004 10:07:23 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793843
 
I have not read a single story that mentions these 350 tons of explosives until now.

Of course not. You admit that thousands of troops have been looking for thousands of tons of explosives. Why would anybody be running a story about this batch? The fact that they were of a different grade was not of any interest to the general public. We have no way of knowing what happened to them, or if they even still exist. The only interest is as a fraudulent "gotcha" a week before the election.



To: KyrosL who wrote (80836)10/26/2004 10:38:01 AM
From: MulhollandDrive  Respond to of 793843
 
no, it's because it was considered a non-story until the eve of the election

have read countless stories about the thousands searching for WMDs from day one. I have not read a single story that mentions these 350 tons of explosives until now