Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KyrosL who wrote (80837)	10/26/2004 10:05:54 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793834

>>some of them used for mining and such, the way I understand it. Your bias is really showing. Believing Saddam, disbelieving Bush is a new low for you.

To: KyrosL who wrote (80837)	10/26/2004 3:20:49 PM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 793834

So before the war we had 35 tons missing, some of them used for mining and such, the way I understand it. Now we have 350 tons missing I understand the game your playing...so this will be my only post on this. When the 101st Airborne Division went in to that depot, the 2nd or 3rd week of the invasion, the explosives were gone. End of story. Everything since then is a lie. The number sounds so awesome yet it is not. In terms of tonnage it would not supply a US Division for a day. All of the demo BS about this now... is just that... BS. It reminds me of the Christmas in Cambodia story in the John Kerry book of fairy tales.