Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doug R who wrote (8687)	10/26/2004 3:33:54 PM
From: LPS5	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

When Vreeland was IN COURT, the Pentagon was called and they verified it. What part of that don't you understand? I think it's you who need to tighten up your reading comprehension. Follow along. *** I asked you how you reached the conclusion that "Vreeland was verified as a Pentagon asset"... Message 20689192 ...to which you replied that "the Pentagon was called and they verified it." Message 20689319 But in fact, the article said no such thing. Instead, what was reported is as follows: "...Vreeland's story played out for two years like a Hollywood script, and included the requisite dramatic court scene, when a judge allowed Vreeland to call the Pentagon in open court and an officer confirmed that Lieut. D. Vreeland was listed in its phone directory." thestar.com Nothing was "confirmed" other than that someone with the same last name and first initial was listed in the Pentagon's phone book. *** So: what part of that don't you understand? LPS5