To: Doug R who wrote (8695 ) 10/26/2004 5:16:12 PM From: LPS5 Read Replies (1) | Respond to If it is true that people in shrub's administration had a major hand in the commission of the attacks on 9/11, it would be prudent to bring up what Delmart Vreeland has said regarding 4 devices planned for detonation in Minnesota. you have any evidence that the Bush Administration was behind the attacks of 9/11?If the event does not occur there would be 2 explanations. 1.) Vreeland's warning is not credible. 2.) Vreeland's warning helped bring the event to light and made it inoperative. All your spewing and hissing over my posts is completely irrelevant. I am only posting Vreeland's warning here. My intent is not to argue about it. I am offering it as information that individuals can take or leave on their own judgement. They can also ask themselves why you have taken it upon yourself to try and dictate how they should process the information. slighest expectation of influencing, let alone changing, the minds of the conspiracy theorists here? I've been posting here since the beginning, and I'm quite familiar with the response to any line of reasoning that doesn't arrive at a conspiratorial conclusion.My posts are in keeping with the intent of this thread. You may keep trying to argue with me if you like but I will not argue with you. will offer that not arguing with me is a good option for you, and one that you should exercise.I will, however, respond to you with the information itself...that Vreeland has warned of 4 one kiloton nuclear devices planned for detonation in the Minnesota area.
