SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (208801)10/26/2004 10:21:21 PM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 1572942
 
These weapons were not there when US troops went to this site in 2003.

While this is stated as an opinion, nobody has shown a link that shows that the explosives were missing prior to the troops arrival. The only statement from the military is that they didn't see any, but they weren't looking, and only peeked in about 40 of the 1000 buildings on the vast site. The NBC reporter confirms.

TP



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (208801)10/26/2004 11:32:37 PM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572942
 
Ten

what about that IAEA's presentation to UN to begin with? Since when conventional explosives are under International Atomic Energy Agency.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (208801)10/27/2004 1:36:40 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572942
 
Ted, the "October Surprise" fizzled:

Who knows?

ted



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (208801)10/27/2004 1:38:27 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572942
 
Ted, the "October Surprise" fizzled:

Not with the people with whom I've spoken.

ted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News