Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Perils and Pitfalls of Investing With "Friends" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Intrepid1 who wrote (96)	10/27/2004 1:53:51 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 377

etc. , Slow down and think about this a minute: Michal didn't get back 90% of his money. You have a receipt saying he did? You're certainly asserting he did. No, you have TLC's word saying he did. Michal doesn't have his money. But... I'm beginning to annoy you? I'm twisting the truth? Why does Michal not having his money, make you annoyed with me? I don't have anything to do with it. That's the conversation between you and Michal. Why are you bothering me with this? Show me some logical step-by-step why Michal's money makes you annoyed with ... me.

To: Intrepid1 who wrote (96)	10/27/2004 10:35:18 AM
From: Done, gone.	Respond to of 377

Michal Daniel did get back 90% of his money on one of the TLC ventures he complained about. I checked my files. I indeed did get back 90% of the $500 I put into the stock deal. For the record, I didn't "complain" about the stock deal. I simply posted the emails I got about it, then proceeded to discuss the matter with you. Message 20687316 Message 20687320 Message 20688141 Message 20688221 On the larger amount of $30,000, there were genuine attempts made by TLC to get Daniel his money back. The last communication I have from the fowl is dated 06/19/02 and deals with mentalmutt.com, whatever that was. Not a word for ages before that about any effort to produce what was promissed, or to refund. Zero contacts since then, unless I am mistaken and am missing some emails. Doubt it. So much for "genuine attempts to get Daniel his money back," as far as I can tell.