Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Vet who wrote (31853)	10/27/2004 10:38:50 AM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 39344

Edit DAK

To: The Vet who wrote (31853)	10/27/2004 11:00:07 AM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 39344

<You have been the one claiming that COMEX has the gold and they wouldn't knowingly allow more to be sold than they have, but you haven't bothered to look it up yourself?> I did NOT claim that [I even said "do they accept a promise from Newmont?]. I just said you should look into it if you don't like the mechanism in place for gold delivery. I still say that's a good idea [while not giving an opinion on it] because you seen to assert that if the gold isn't on site, it's 'naked short'. That appears naive to me, but to each his own. The main thrust of your assertion was the paper markets [to me that means COMEX] were rigged against the shorts. I dispute that... and you've presumably dropped it. DAK