Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geode00 who wrote (32421)	10/28/2004 12:42:00 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

If you understood the first thing about financial statements you would never say that. Thanks for proving your ignorance.

To: geode00 who wrote (32421)	10/28/2004 12:48:00 AM
From: Karen Lawrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Brilliant post.

To: geode00 who wrote (32421)	10/28/2004 12:51:18 AM
From: upanddown	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

30 million???? How the hell is Chaney going to survive on a mere 30 mil? He made at least twice that and probably more. The number I heard was 75 mil. I could be wrong. Maybe his enormous net worth came from his selfless years as a "public servant". Not bad compensation considering the stock went nowhere during his tenure and most company metrics (ROI, ROE, etc.) actually declined during his five years. Another thing....Chaney never ran Halliburton. He doesn't know diddly about the business. Dave Lesar always ran the company. Chaney was just a rainmaker, the guy with the grease. Take a look at Chaney's shape pre- and post-Halliburton. Definitely too many fatcat lunches at the Petroleum Club in Dallas.