To: epicure who wrote (13386 ) 10/28/2004 10:04:22 PM From: Brumar89 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773 you don't shack up with people who want you dead- People do shack up with idealogical enemies. The Hitler-Stalin pact comes to mind as a prominent example. The alliance between the crusaders of Acre and the Mamelukes against the Mongols is another. In the mideast also, people frequently ally with idealogical and religious enemies against a perceived greater enemy. And they just as frequently stab idealogical allies in the back. A few examples off the top of my head. Iran, a fundamentalist Muslim state, cooperates quite well with Syria, ruled by a dictorial family which belongs to both the Baath party and a heretical Islamic sect, the Alawites. meib.org Iran also quietly cooperates with and aids terror groups of the Sunni persuasion despite the animosity between Shiite and Sunni fundamentalists. globalsecurity.org Syria, in turn, also cooperates with the Saudi ruling family despite their religious differences. meib.org Sudan, ruled by a fundamentalist gov't, once harbored Al Qaida but later the same gov't turned against them and offered to cooperate with the US against them. Osama bin Ladin turned against the ruling family of Saudi Arabia for allying with the US when Saddam threatened the country. Nevertheless, the Saudi gov't and AQ made an effective truce and cooperative relationship which lasted until last year. I could go on and on - the mideast and human history shows many examples of "enemies" allying, "allies" betraying one another, and apparent rigid fundamentalist fanatics making practical calculated alliances with "secularists", heretics, and even those of other religions all together. All in all, the viewpoint below is way too rigid and is IMO a good example of forming and maintaining rigid mental "boxes" to justify a preconceived opinion: and that was why Saddam couldn't, and NEVER could, get in to bed with Al Q. They want rulers top be subservient to the Koran