Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russwinter who wrote (31875)	10/28/2004 7:40:25 AM
From: rubbersoul	Respond to of 39344

Thanks, for your post on ANO.U, Russ. I agree, they are extremely undervalued with blue sky potential. I've added at these price levels and may buy more. John

To: russwinter who wrote (31875)	10/28/2004 12:18:50 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Respond to of 39344

Russ, Very good analysis and I couldn't agree more. I would just have put more emphasis on Tunceli which I think is very likely to surpass Copler. We should know later this year or early 2005.

To: russwinter who wrote (31875)	10/28/2004 12:28:31 PM
From: bmccra	Respond to of 39344

Hello Russ. Perhaps Anatolia should be joining the other companies who have chosen to dual-list on the TSX and AMEX and maybe that would help some. I’m not sure why they chose to trade in USD on the TSX and agree that it doesn’t help. Re their other projects there is no question about the blue sky potential. Rio Tinto is elephant hunting and Anatolia is along for the ride. And meanwhile they sit on a multi-million ounce resource at Copler, 100% owned. Nice situation. Strange that the market seems to be overlooking them, but that happens. One negative is the Kinross did nothing with this opportunity when they bought their 4m shares: “Kinross shall have the right to conduct due diligence in relation to a potential strategic alliance and review all of Anatolia’s data on the Çöpler property and its other non-Rio Tinto properties. Following closing, Kinross shall have a 90-day exclusive right to enter into an earn-in, royalty, acquisition or similar agreement in respect of Çöpler with Anatolia.” I would also like to hear more about these prospects (especially Karagoz) besides the Tunceli JV you mentioned and I have included: Kizilviran copper/gold porphyry prospect in the Tunceli JV area: “Preliminary results are very encouraging, averaging 0.4% copper, 0.14 grams gold per tonne and 0.004% molybdenum from 13.5 to 594 meters.” Updated assays improved those numbers. “Adjusting for the lost copper and molybdenum values at present prices means the first hole at Kizilviran averaged 0.6% copper equivalent for a full 594 meters. This is a great first hole.” Karagöz Gold: “Detailed mapping and sampling by R. Loring, consultant from Nevada, has determined two gold mineralized structures at the Karagöz prospect in south-central Turkey. A series of 2-meter to +5-meter rock chip samples across two 200+-meter long, 3 to 20 meter wide, silicified breccia zones returned high gold values. A 60-meter long, 15 to 20 meter wide section averaged approximately 1 ounce of gold per tonne, the highest value being 59 grams of gold per tonne. Up to 200 grams of silver per tonne accompanied the gold.” Üçkapili Gold: “12 kilometers on trend southeast of Karagöz, detailed mapping and sampling by Mr. Loring confirmed the presence of a target on Anatolia’s adjoining Üçkapili prospect. Incorporating previous continuous rock chip/sawed sampling, Anatolia estimates an average 1.55 grams of gold per tonne for a 1,500 meter long, 160 meter wide, 60 meter thick schist horizon within a kilometers-long, 200 to 600 meter wide silicified shear zone.” Those were mentioned in an exploration update back in August of 2003. anatolia-minerals.com b