SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Travel Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale Baker who wrote (243)2/1/2005 1:17:49 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 1521
 
The people might have finally had ENOUGH of the crooks and CRUISE SHIPS!

General strike in Belize

by George and Candy Gonzalez
Demonstrators tore paving stones off the steps of the National Assembly to hurl at the police, who were dressed in their brand new “robo-cop” uniforms.
Photos: The Star Newspaper, Cayo, Belize

Civil unrest broke out in Belmopan, capital city of Belize, provoked by the release of a new national budget with significant tax increases as well as anger at the ruling People’s United Party for the worsening fiscal condition of the Belizean government. The government’s 2005-2006 budget, released on Jan. 13, includes major tax increases on a variety of businesses and commodities and further delays long overdue raises to teachers and public service workers.

No longer could popular frustration be restrained after years of alleged financial mismanagement and corruption by the People’s United Party that included non-stop spending and borrowing, sale of the country’s assets, privatizing the water, the electricity, the airport and the port, and even the potential leasing of the barrier reef and Mayan archaeological sites. Belize is bordered by Mexico, Guatemala and a 270-mile Caribbean coastline.
Among the demonstrators on Jan. 21 in front of the Belize National Assembly are teachers, union members, civil society and business people who represent a cross section of the Belizean population. The Belize population is almost 32.9 percent Creole (mixed Black with white), 40.7 percent Mestizo (Indigenous and white), 6.1 percent Garifuna (Blacks originating from Africans and Caribs), 10.6 percent Maya and 9.7 percent “other,” which includes East Indians, Middle Easterners, Europeans and Chinese.

The new budget sparked protests at the National Assembly building on Jan. 15. The Chamber of Commerce, the unions, the Better Business Bureau and civil society called for the implementation of reforms against continued corruption, before any new taxes are even considered. The government decided they did not have to pay attention.

Prime Minister Said Musa said of the budget measure, which raises some taxes by as much as 22 percent, that increases are necessary to help pay spiraling international debt. His administration has been plagued by financial scandals and higher living costs.

The people finally said “enough!” and a general strike was called for Jan. 20-21 by a rare coalition of unions, businesses and civil society. The call was answered. About 90 percent of the businesses and all the schools, from primary to university level, closed nationwide.

George Frazer, general secretary of the umbrella National Trade Union Congress of Belize, called for the general strike, saying the unions want to send a clear message to the government: “We are prepared to work along with any government and to try in the best interest of Belize to see where we can close the gaps, but first we have to also close those loopholes and those areas where abuses have come.”

The Belize National Teachers Union ordered its members out of the classroom on Thursday and Friday. Their president, Anthony Fuentes, told reporters there is no need for the government to tax the Belizean people: “There are a lot of monies out there that the government needs to collect, and we are saying that they need to collect these monies.”

The Public Service Union also instructed its members to stay home, along with the Christian Workers Union and other unions representing telecommunications, electricity and water services workers. They issued directives to their members not to report for work until further notice.

The Belize Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Belize Business Bureau also issued strike orders to their members, but the BBB went one step further and extended the strike to Saturday.

On Thursday, Jan. 20, one day ahead of the 2005-2006 budget debate, the unions led the way, staging marches and rallies across the country. In Belize City, a crowd of 800-1,000 supporters took their protests to the streets, marching from Memorial Park through some of the principal streets of Belize City to Battlefield Park, all the while hoisting strongly worded signs and singing union songs.

On Friday, in the capital city of Belmopan, a huge and angry crowd demonstrated in front of the National Assembly while the House of Representatives met inside to discuss the implementation of new taxes. Throughout, the demonstrators loudly expressed their rage but overall remained remarkably controlled and well behaved.

Protestors threw rocks at the police, who responded with rubber bullets, plastic pellets and riot gas. Several protestors were arrested. The permission for the demonstration ended at 3 p.m., but the protestors were given a one-hour extension. At the end of the extension, repeated demands for dispersal were largely ignored. Some union workers lay down and refused to leave, wanting to wait for the members of the National Assembly to come out; they were physically dragged from the area.

Though the opposition United Democratic Party participated on the side of those calling for the demonstration, and the ruling PUP called for a counter–demonstration, the message from the people was clear – this had nothing to do with party politics and divisions; this had to do with the need to make the government accountable, implement reforms, stop corruption and address the needs of the people.

In August 2004, the people of Belize found out that their country’s state pension fund had shelled out $3 million to cover debt guarantees to a company owned by a former government minister. Seven ministers – more than half the cabinet – resigned to demand the firing of the finance minister. The prime minister did not fire the finance minister but took over the finance portfolio himself, and brought the “rebels” back into the cabinet.

Since Mr. Musa took office in 1998, public debt has increased from 41 percent of GDP to 93 percent, much of it borrowed at commercial rates. Belize is among the 30 most heavily indebted emerging economy governments. Seven of the Caribbean countries, including Belize, are in the top 10. Except in the case of the bluest-chip borrowers, economists worry when public debt goes much above 50 percent of GDP, according to the Caribbean Net News of Aug. 27, 2004.

Two of the seven cabinet members have recently been shuffled out of the cabinet but have not attacked the government any further. Therefore, it was a most telling indictment of Mr. Musa’s government on Friday when the two PUP dissidents, Mark Espat and Cordel Hyde, voted against the budget and with the opposition. It was an historic first in Belizean political history.

“We voted against the budget,” said Cordel Hyde, “because the budget does not support poor people, and my constituents are poor people.” He added later to a television interviewer, “If I was still in the cabinet and this budget was presented, I would have voted against this budget and it would have signaled my resignation from the cabinet.”

Mark Espat, the other dissident, said, “I am working for my constituents and I will continue to do so. I am a member of the PUP today, but I believe today is a vote of conscience. Earlier this week, African Americans and all of us celebrated the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr., and at critical times in his career, in his march for civil rights, he said that there is such a thing as the trumpet of conscience, and that trumpet sounded today. It sounded loudly, and it was a vote of conscience.”

The government has been running a large budget deficit and is spending much more than it takes in. It has a huge trade deficit. Cronies and insiders have been rewarded with big contracts and sweetheart deals. Small entrepreneurs and conservation interests have been dissed. The big stakeholders –– Carnival Cruise Lines and political insiders –– have been rewarded with new, financially lucrative deals. The currency has been under stress.

This past week has shown that the people of this country are prepared to stand up and are prepared to insist that things be done differently. This government, whichever party is in power, must heed the cry of the people. Belize has turned a corner and will never be the same.

George Gonzalez is from the Mission District of San Francisco, having worked with Los Siete de La Raza and the United Prisoners’ Union in the 1970s. Candy Gonzalez was with the Student Non–Violent Coordinating Committee in the 1960s and with the Drug Research Project in San Francisco in the early 1970s. They are now nationalized Belize. Email them at geocan@starband.net.



To: Dale Baker who wrote (243)2/28/2005 1:26:12 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 1521
 
scubalinx.com
CC



To: Dale Baker who wrote (243)3/4/2005 2:40:01 AM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 1521
 
I highly recommend subscribing to Joe's column...great stuff..cheap per year....
AIRLINES IN LIELAND
By Joe Brancatelli
March 3, 2005 -- You and I wake up most mornings of our working lives and head to an airport knowing that we're about to be lied to by whatever airline we happen to be flying that particular day.

Airlines lie about their schedules. (I called Air India on Monday afternoon during a howling East Coast snowstorm to inquire about its 9 p.m. departure to Paris. Despite the rapidly deteriorating weather, the voice on the other end of the phone huffily insisted that the flight would leave on time. It actually departed after midnight.)

Airlines lie about their fares. (A British court on Wednesday ruled that Ryanair misled customers by promoting fares without mentioning that the prices did not include taxes. The ever-pugnacious folks at Ryanair insisted that the repeated promotional gaffes were merely accidents.)

Airlines lie about their service. (I recently helped a friend book an itinerary to Hawaii. Continental insists that Flight 49 from Newark to Maui is a one-stop flight. But Flight 49 actually requires that you fly a Boeing 757 to its Houston/Intercontinental hub, disembark, walk the entire distance of the U-shaped Terminal E, then board a Boeing 767 that is also called Flight 49. This particular airline lie even has a name: a "change of gauge" flight.)

Airlines lie about everything, in fact. The salaries of their executives. Their tax burden. Their frequent-flyer programs. Their rules. And even their names. After all, code-sharing is nothing if it is not putting one airline's name on a flight that is actually operated by another carrier.

But what I want to discuss today is this: If you and I know that the airlines lie, and that they lie all the time, why don't my compatriots in the mainstream media know this?

I refer, of course, to Wednesday's report from the Inspector General of the Department of Transportation. He concluded that the inept management of US Airways was to blame for the Christmas-holiday meltdown that inconvenienced more than 500,000 travelers and caused about 400 flight cancellations, 3,900 flight delays and 70,000 lost bags.

If the IG's analysis comes as a surprise to you, it's only because you were watching or reading about the debacle during the holiday, when the general media were devoting round-the-clock attention to the situation until the Asian tsunami put everything into perspective. Day after day, US Airways spokespeople stepped up to the microphones and claimed that the problems were caused by an unexpected spike in sick calls from employees. They hinted darkly at an illegal job action. And US Airways chief executive officer Bruce Lakefield--who coined the term "operational meltdown"--blamed the fiasco on the "irresponsible actions of a few."

The reporters who served up these assertions from US Airways as gospel truth never once questioned the airline's claims. US Airways spokespeople presented phony numbers--deftly juxtaposing an average day's worth of sick calls with the always-higher holiday rate--as proof of their claims. Few reporters demanded clarification, even though US Airways' public-relations types have a proven track record of unreliability and egregious distortion. The media ran with Lakefield's canned comments and never mentioned that neither he nor chairman David Bronner were interviewed. They never mentioned that neither was even on the scene at US Airways during the holidays. And the media waited days before reporting the counterclaims of US Airways' labor unions that the airline's line employees were not engaged in a sick-out and were not absent in unexpected numbers.

As you can read in the IG's report, every assertion that US Airways made was a lie, a fabrication or a preventable error. The IG places the entire blame on US Airways management for bad planning, sloppiness, penury, stupidity and downright idiocy. And it shows that US Airways employees were neither absent in extraordinary numbers nor engaged in a job action over Christmas.

It was all a fog of lies and incompetence on the part of US Airways management--and the media breathlessly covering the story over Christmas blithely and credulously waded into the fog.

If this were a one-time failing on the part of my mass-media comrades, I'd be more forgiving. After all, I know better than most the pressure that my colleagues are under. Hell, I helped trained a goodly number of the people on the front line of business journalism today.

But Christmas in Airline LieLand was not an exception. It's the rule. Airlines have been lying to the mass media for years. And the media keeps getting fooled in crisis after crisis.

These are, after all, the very same media people who continue to report to you that Richard Branson says he'll launch Virgin America this year--without reminding you that he's been saying the same thing since at least 1999 or mentioning that Branson has no money, no planes, no routes and no government approval to fly.

These are the same people who report to you that United chief executive Glenn Tilton says he'll be buying other airlines after United exits bankruptcy later this year. But they report his comments without mentioning that United is more than two years into Chapter 11 and hasn't even presented a plan of reorganization to the court or that Tilton has a documented trail of delusional overstatement and outright falsehood about everything that has happened at United since he took over late in 2002.

These are the same media types who lionized Gordon Bethune when he left Continental at the end of last year without mentioning that he was consistently, conspicuously, loudly and spectacularly wrong about everything that has occurred at Continental in specific and the airline business in general after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Nor did they bother to mention that Continental's new management filed a report with the Securities and Exchange Commission just days after Bethune officially departed and admitted that the airline was a financial basket case.

I can explain in excruciating detail a lot of the reasons why my media colleagues have lost the battle of self-evident truth with the airlines. Some reasons are cultural: We still live in a society where it's okay to say "the company offers but unions demand." Some are institutional: Most mass-media outlets are owned by huge conglomerates whose corporate goals are profits, not truth. And some are structural: It is nearly impossible for classically trained American business journalists to cope with an industry that is fundamentally dysfunctional, largely bankrupt and historically incoherent.

But some of the reasons are simply attitudinal. The underpaid, overworked men and women who write your daily newspapers, business magazines and television and radio programs assume that the airlines are telling the truth until proven otherwise.

Not me. As a business traveler as well as a business journalist, I know better. Like you, I assume the airlines are lying until they can prove otherwise.

A little more of a business traveler's incredulity on the part of my mass-media colleagues would go a long, long way in cutting through the fog of Airlines in LieLand.