Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (81413)	10/28/2004 11:56:39 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793911

This gets lost in the noise. Can you say, "Rowback?" Excerpted from Powerline. "Here is what the [NY Times] wrote in its original Al Qaqaa story: White House and Pentagon officials acknowledge that the explosives vanished sometime after the American-led invasion last year." This was not true, of course. Here is what Keller said yesterday. "Keller also can't quite understand what all the fuss is about: The principal uncertainty about the story involves the timing of the ammunition's disappearance. The White House says the explosives may have gone missing while Saddam Hussein still controlled Iraq. "Sure there's a possibility" that happened, Keller said, "and I think the original story accounted for that possibility. . . . I don't think we've ever claimed there was a definitive answer to what became of this stuff."