SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zeta1961 who wrote (13576)10/28/2004 2:11:02 PM
From: Ian@SI  Respond to of 52153
 
Another Resveratrol story for Peter...

Abstract: Public Release: 28-Oct-2004
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology

Red wine mist? Resveratrol shows potential effects against COPD, asthma, arthritis

Resveratrol exhibited anti-inflammatory activity in all systems examined: laboratory cells lines as well as human airway epithelial cells. Imperial College London study is novel as it examines the anti-inflammatory mechanism(s) of resveratrol in cells relevant to human disease and explores all proposed mechanisms of action. Resveratrol didn't act as either an estrogen or glucocorticosteroid, both of which hinder patient compliance. Developing an aerosol version seen as key for COPD, steroid-resistant asthma.
Pharmascience Inc., Pharmacia (Pfizer), British Lung Foundation, National Asthma Campaign

Whole story: eurekalert.org



To: zeta1961 who wrote (13576)10/28/2004 2:17:36 PM
From: Icebrg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
>>Another asked specifically about the taxotere study which had 2.5 month median survival advantage..the CEO went back to his response that "these survival #'s are better than any published P3 prostate late stage prostate cancer.">>

The study he was referring to was most probably TAX 327.

Aventis Receives FDA Approval for Taxotere®

24 May 2004

London, UK, May 24, 2004 – Aventis announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved, in record time, Taxotere® (docetaxel) Injection Concentrate for use in combination with prednisone as a treatment for men with androgen-independent (hormone-refractory) metastatic prostate cancer.

The fast-tracked FDA approval - taking a total of 113 days - supports the strength of the phase III clinical data and the survival benefit it will bring to prostate cancer patients.

The FDA approval is based on the final results of a landmark phase III clinical trial that met its primary endpoint of increasing survival in this patient population. The pivotal study, TAX 327 - which involved six centres across the UK - along with an additional study of Taxotere in this patient population, have been selected for presentation at the Plenary Session at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting on Monday, 7th June, New Orleans, LA.


And this is the abstract as published in NEJM for this study.

Docetaxel plus Prednisone or Mitoxantrone plus Prednisone for Advanced Prostate Cancer
Ian F. Tannock, M.D., Ph.D., Ronald de Wit, M.D., William R. Berry, M.D., Jozsef Horti, M.D., Anna Pluzanska, M.D., Kim N. Chi, M.D., Stephane Oudard, M.D., Christine Théodore, M.D., Nicholas D. James, M.D., Ph.D., Ingela Turesson, M.D., Ph.D., Mark A. Rosenthal, M.D., Ph.D., Mario A. Eisenberger, M.D., for the TAX 327 Investigators

N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7; 351(15): 1502-12

ABSTRACT

Background
Mitoxantrone plus prednisone reduces pain and improves the quality of life in men with advanced, hormone-refractory prostate cancer, but it does not improve survival. We compared such treatment with docetaxel plus prednisone in men with this disease.

Methods
From March 2000 through June 2002, 1006 men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer received 5 mg of prednisone twice daily and were randomly assigned to receive 12 mg of mitoxantrone per square meter of body-surface area every three weeks, 75 mg of docetaxel per square meter every three weeks, or 30 mg of docetaxel per square meter weekly for five of every six weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were pain, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and the quality of life. All statistical comparisons were against mitoxantrone.

Results
As compared with the men in the mitoxantrone group, men in the group given docetaxel every three weeks had a hazard ratio for death of 0.76 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.94; P=0.009 by the stratified log-rank test) and those given weekly docetaxel had a hazard ratio for death of 0.91 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.11; P=0.36). The median survival was 16.5 months in the mitoxantrone group, 18.9 months in the group given docetaxel every 3 weeks, and 17.4 months in the group given weekly docetaxel. Among these three groups, 32 percent, 45 percent, and 48 percent of men, respectively, had at least a 50 percent decrease in the serum PSA level (P<0.001 for both comparisons with mitoxantrone); 22 percent, 35 percent (P=0.01), and 31 percent (P=0.08) had predefined reductions in pain; and 13 percent, 22 percent (P=0.009), and 23 percent (P=0.005) had improvements in the quality of life. Adverse events were also more common in the groups that received docetaxel.

Conclusions
When given with prednisone, treatment with docetaxel every three weeks led to superior survival and improved rates of response in terms of pain, serum PSA level, and quality of life, as compared with mitoxantrone plus prednisone.



To: zeta1961 who wrote (13576)10/28/2004 2:49:48 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Respond to of 52153
 
>> basically stated what the PR <<

Sorry, can't even think of trying to read a PR today. Moving slow and foggy.

>> greater survival advantage than any other P3 heretofore published late stage prostate cancer trial. <<

thanks.

My thesis and postdoctoral work was MHC..... cell-mediated responses across a major barrier, serology, transfection of MHC variants to restrict anti-viral responses, etc. I know what T cells can do. They are tough. They can beat the stuffing out of cancers, across relatively minor transplantion barriers. I was off to study exactly that (rejection of MHC-induced fibrosarcomas across non-MHC transplantation barriers), at Jackson Labs, for my first postdoc..... with the world's expert on "minor" transplantation antigens. But then I heard about a lab moving from Dallas to a place where they had good beer, so I decided to change projects.

I've also studied the immunogenicity of spontaneous and chemically-induced cancers in exacting animal models (cancers of recent origin, experiments conducted with early-passage cells in the exact substrain of origin, etc.).

I therefore know what I want survival curves to look like. I don't believe that a majority of patients can be significantly helped (not discounting some value from "adjuvant" effects) with cancer vaccines, but I expect a decent frequency of cures where and if there's a small percentage of individuals whose cancers can be "marked" by the immune system.

I would love to hear of a few long-term survivors among g>7.

Can't wait to see the data in tables/figures, as I've been picturing them for about 20 years.

:-)

aside.... "adjuvant", not in context of immunology.



To: zeta1961 who wrote (13576)10/28/2004 9:30:24 PM
From: Miljenko Zuanic  Respond to of 52153
 
<<Based on this data, they are having active discussions with FDA for: broader label since the current trial is for gleason less than 7, accelerated approval and using current study as post marketing are part of discussions, >>

So, now again they want to change PIII statistic, as (my speculation) G>7 show greater survival benefit than G<7. Wander, how many subgroup one can form from 127 pts, IF minimal number of subject in group is ½?

Miljenko