Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (149625)	10/28/2004 2:26:33 PM
From: Michael Watkins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

It certainly speaks to plausibility of the timeline being promoted by everyone but the administration and its supporters. I particularly like this line: bunker after bunker of material labelled "explosives." Repeat after me: bunker after bunker of material labelled "explosives." bunker after bunker of material labelled "explosives." bunker after bunker of material labelled "explosives." bunker after bunker of material labelled "explosives." Now reconcile that with other reports, sanitized from identification from "Bush Blogs", which assert there was no way there was material there. Its almost humorous. PS, the article also says "Usually it took just the snap of a bolt cutter to get into the bunkers and see the material identified by the 101st as detonation cords." Hmnn... a bold cutter. Do you think that might have been used to cut... I don't know... an IAEA seal? It would be humorous if not so sad.