SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: redfish who wrote (22794)10/28/2004 2:33:09 PM
From: redfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27181
 
Which base is more energized? That's easy: the Democrats. If you ask Kerry supporters whether the 2004 election is the most important in their lifetimes, like Newsweek did, 37 percent say yes. Ask Bush supporters the same question, and only 27 percent say yes. And even if Kerry supporters tell you that the 2004 election isn't the most important of their lifetimes, 40 percent still say that it is more important than others. By contrast, only 35 percent of the Bush supporters think this election is more important than others.

This intensity shows up in other ways. Recently the Annenberg Public Policy Center asked committed voters whether they were following the election very closely. Fifty-four percent of Kerry voters said yes -- three points more than the 51 percent of Bush backers who agreed.

Combine this level of intensity with the fact that both campaigns are playing to their base, and you see why the election is so difficult to call. Strategists in both camps agree that the result may hinge on turnout. Devine told reporters to expect turnout in the 118 million range -- millions more than in 2000. "Potentially it could be higher," Devine said. He sure hopes so. Higher turnout historically favors Democrats.

cbsnews.com



To: redfish who wrote (22794)10/28/2004 2:46:40 PM
From: Gus  Respond to of 27181
 
The Leaning Poll of State Bias

There has been a lot of talk about the direction and meaning of the polls in the close races, and I have decided to show an easy way to spot leanings. I took a look again at four states where the Presidential race is deemed close, and I have examined how the major polls spoke for public opinion. I say “major polls", because when a poll shows up in only one state, like the Badger Poll in Wisconsin or the Ohio Poll, you can’t tell if they reflect the mood or have a lean in their practices; the multi-state polls tend to show a pattern, I found. I examined the major polls (thank you, RCP!) in Ohio, Florida, Wisconsin, and Minnesota, and broke each poll down to the last 2 weeks, the last month, and for the campaign term. I noted only those polls which showed someone in the lead.

Survey USA has worked hard to show a lot of details and make the case for their objectivity, but for two of these states, they show a clear dislike for the President. SUSA does not show up for Wisconsin or Minnesota, but in Ohio, their last three polls all show Kerry in the lead, only one poll this year shows Bush leading in Ohio. In Florida, their last 2 polls show Bush trailing, with 3 of 6 this year showing Bush behind Kerry in Florida. In those 2 states, then, SUSA’s last five polls all show Bush behind, and for the year, only one SUSA poll in either state all year ever showed Bush ahead.

American Research Group is also no friend of the President. In Ohio, the last two polls show Bush behind, and six out of seven all year in Ohio give Kerry the lead over Bush in Ohio. In Florida, again the last 2 polls show Kerry leading, and for the whole year, Bush leads in only 2 of 9 ARG polls there. In Wisconsin, ARG has no poll with a leader for the past month; for the year, the only 2 polls ARG released with a leader in Wisconsin went for Kerry. In Minnesota, the only poll all year which showed a leader for ARG went for Kerry. For the four states, their last 4 polls all went for Kerry when they showed a lead, and for the year in these four states, Bush led in 3 polls while Kerry led in the other 16.

Looking on the other side, Strategic Vision has been a cheerleader for Bush, complete with pom-poms. In Ohio, in all 8 polls this year SV shows Bush ahead. In Florida, their last 4 showed Bush ahead, and 6 out of 8 for the year. In Wisconsin, SV’s last 3 polls show the President leading, and 6 out of 7 for the year. The only SV downer for Bush is Minnesota, where only 1 of their last 3 shows Bush ahead, and only 1 out of 7 for the year. For the 4 states, Bush leads in 10 of 12 recent polls (since Sept. 28), and for the year, Bush leads in 21 of 30 polls.

Zogby is a particularly partisan agency, but I did see a small surprise in Ohio. In Ohio, the only poll with a leader in the last month went for Kerry, but for the year, 5 out of 8 leads in Ohio went to Bush. In Florida, the only Zogby poll with a leader in the last month went for Bush, but only 3 out of 9 this year. In Wisconsin, the only Zogby poll in the last month with a leader went for Kerry, and all 9 polls there this year went for Kerry. The same case happened in Minnesota, where the only Zogby poll with a leader in the last month went for Kerry, and all 9 this year. Overall, then, in the last month, 3 of the 4 Zogby polls showing a leader went for Kerry, and 27 out of 35 Zogby polls in these states showed Bush behind.

Rasmussen was interesting. In Ohio, the 3 polls since Sept. 28 show Bush ahead, and 6 out of 9 for the year. In Florida, the last 2 polls show Bush ahead, but for the year, 4 out of 7 polls had Kerry ahead. In Wisconsin, the only poll from the past month shows Kerry ahead; for the year, 2 of the 4 polls favor Bush, and the other 2 favor Kerry. In Minnesota, the last 2 polls are split, but for the year, 6 out of 7 show Kerry ahead. Overall, then, in the last month Bush leads in 6 out of 7 polls, but for the year Kerry leads in 15 out of 27 polls.

These examples show a clear indication, not that the poll has a candidate they want to support necessarily, but that their methods of polling favor one party more than another. When looking at the new polls in this final week, therefore, be sure to look back a little bit and see what they’ve been saying all along the way.

-- DJ Drummond

polipundit.com



To: redfish who wrote (22794)10/28/2004 2:47:29 PM
From: Andrew N. Cothran  Respond to of 27181
 
So Redfish: Make sure your friends read these words of great wisdom.

If they read them thoughtfully and well, their vote is preordained.

And it won't be for Kerry.

IF HISTORY TEACHES ANYTHING, it teaches self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly. We see around us today the marks of our terrible dilemma--predictions of doomsday, antinuclear demonstrations, an arms race in which the West must, for its own protection, be an unwilling participant. At the same time we see totalitarian forces in the world who seek subversion and conflict around the globe to further their barbarous assault on the human spirit. What, then, is our course? Must civilization perish in a hail of fiery atoms? Must freedom wither in a quiet, deadening accommodation with totalitarian evil?
...
all the democracies paid a terrible price for allowing the dictators to underestimate us. We dare not make that mistake again. So, let us ask ourselves, "What kind of people do we think we are?" And let us answer, "Free people, worthy of freedom and determined not only to remain so but to help others gain their freedom as well."

Ronald Reagan - June 8, 1982