Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mao II who wrote (63581)	10/28/2004 5:04:19 PM
From: mistermj	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

MAO II DEBUNKED...again. By your own link. In fact, your report refuses to name officials or give dates to verify your assertions. >>Fleming did not say which officials were notified or exactly when<< Why is that? So it can't be proven or verified obviously. ------------------------------------------------- Whats this? Apparently the IAEA is making this up as they go. Now they didn't seem to know how much or where the explosives were. >>ABC News, citing IAEA inspection documents, reported Wednesday night that the Iraqis had declared 141 tons of RDX explosives at Al-Qaqaa in July 2002, but that the site held only three tons when it was checked in January 2003. The network said that could suggest that 138 tons were removed from the facility long before the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003. << More examples of lack of control or proper inventory by IAEA in Iraq: >>"IAEA inspectors visited Al-Mahaweel on Jan. 15, 2003, and verified the RDX inventory by weighing sampling," Fleming said. She said the RDX at Al-Mahaweel was not under seal << Not under seal? No records for viable chain of custody? Improper seals or total lack of seals proves the IAEA did not even have the situation under control. They are certainly not the ones to be looking to for answers here. They also made assertions pointed out above yet refuse to name who they warned about the explosives or when. The IAEA has been thoroughly DEBUNKED here with their own words, to be an unreliable witness. In fact it is obvious they have reason to cover their ass and point fingers at others to cover up their obvious mishandling of their watchdog status. Not sealing or leaving seals off of window vents is an error with no excuse. They can not possibly know what happened here. The facts point out the explosives were never properly inventoried or protected from theft and tampering in the first place...IAEA is DEBUNKED as inspectors or verifiers of anything but their own ineptitude. story.news.yahoo.com