Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (149686)	10/28/2004 5:25:03 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

"Since intent cannot be proven, I don't find it relevant." Then you and I have nothing further to discuss. Your conclusion puts everyone in the category of 'liar' from Aristotle to modern day nuclear physicists. Since you insist on using a powerful word that attacks the honor of a man, while dismissing the very element that reflects on his honor/dishonor ... YOU have chosen the path of IRRELEVANCE. No claim of lie or liar that you would choose to attach to a person's conduct has any meaning, none, nada, zip, nowhere and no way. So what is your purpose in using the word in the first place ... just a sexy word that rings alarm bells? You and your arguments about lies and liars are irrelevant. cya