Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.B.C. who wrote (53355)	10/29/2004 12:04:07 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57110

heterosexuals get to have the benefit of the state sanction of their chosen partnership. The state should be blind to who choses to partner with whom. My opinion is that the gov't should not be sanctioning a religious tradition. That's the job of the church. The gov't should be governing the laws of partnerships between people, regardless of their sexual orientation. By supporting an amendment to the constitution that has a religious bias, it is cementing the church and state, not separating.