SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (32762)10/29/2004 6:41:43 AM
From: DayTraderKidd  Respond to of 173976
 
LOLOL I love this story coming out about the Bush add where they doctored the photos to beef up the crowd, and with the military yet. The first thing the Bush administration does is to lie about it. Then once they get busted for lying they come out with the truth..

Why is it that the first reponse from the Bush administration is always to lie??? They are no different than the likes of jallen, longnshort and the rest of the neocons lying on this thread.

Just lie so much and so fast that they wont be able to keep up with you. Unless the press has the real photos or unless the press has pictures of the explosive being in that compound during the invasion. Then you have to come out and tell the American people the truth....



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (32762)10/29/2004 7:55:37 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
It has changed in the last eight days. I believe the quote was on that page.

I don't believe it was. As I said earlier there would be no reason for a topic on the Clinton Administration to be covered on a web site dedicated for the 2004 election. Further, the date on the article for that URL is 8 Jan 2004 with HTML code that inserts todays date at the top. It's also an archived page; they wouldn't change text of an archived page. Look at the URL's to the right, every one is dated after 8 Jan and before Oct.

Let's look at your citation again.

bop2004.org
Enron CEO Kenneth Lay - now the media-proclaimed “most hated man since Kenneth Starr” - actually got from the Clinton Administration, when his $100,000 donation to the first Clinton Inauguration earned him not only 11 sleepovers in the Lincoln Bedroom, but several cozy junkets to Russia, India, Indochina and China with Ron Brown. The access that provided some Administration arm twisting of Indochinese President Suharto - with an accompaniment of highly coveted American taxpayer cash, of course, - that subsequently allowed Enron to build a power plant there.

Now let's compare that with this text from the American Partisan.

american-partisan.com
Enron CEO Kenneth Lay - now the media-proclaimed “most hated man since Kenneth Starr” - actually got from the Clinton Administration, when his $100,000 donation to the first Clinton Inauguration earned him not only 11 sleepovers in the Lincoln Bedroom, but several cozy junkets to Russia, India, Indochina and China with Ron Brown. The access that provided some Administration arm twisting of Indochinese President Suharto - with an accompaniment of highly coveted American taxpayer cash, of course, - that subsequently allowed Enron to build a power plant there.

There's a big difference between the Center for Public Integrity and the American Partisan. You won't find the Center for Public Integrity citing Matt Drudge.

jttmab