SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: redfish who wrote (63950)10/29/2004 1:09:45 PM
From: techguerrilla  Respond to of 89467
 
This administration wears dunce caps ... eom



To: redfish who wrote (63950)10/29/2004 1:10:25 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Respond to of 89467
 
LOL



To: redfish who wrote (63950)10/29/2004 1:11:27 PM
From: DayTraderKidd  Respond to of 89467
 
longnshort can't even keep up with the pace of lying...



To: redfish who wrote (63950)10/29/2004 1:21:55 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
They have said all along -- and Rumsfeld repeated over and over during the Afghanistan war -- that the first reports frequently are wrong. Information comes in slowly from a lot of sources, and sometimes its relevance isn't even known until later when an issue arises. Geez, this happened A YEAR AND A HALF AGO, AND THE IAEA ITSELF JUST REPORTED IT!!!!!! RIGHT??????

Have you ever heard the term, "fog of war"? Soldiers are fighting and trying to kill the enemy before they're killed. They aren't taking notes of every observation and action while bullets are flying and shells exploding. It's not a Hollywood set with a script, takes, and re-takes.

They're investigating, and today they emphasized that they've put a lot of resources over the past few days to account for this 1/1000 of Saddam's known materials that were captured, held, and destroyed.

The very Major who held the conference is back in the States, and only heard about the issue on the news, and at first thought they were talking about material that only recently disappeared, not material that he was involved with A YEAR AND A HALF AGO!

Back in the '70's, I worked on Capitol Hill and did a research project at the Library of Congress involving Navy records from some WWII actions. During the course of it, I opened reams of bound materials of battles from the 1940's, whose dried out pages cracked in my hands from age, never having been looked at since they were filed in the '40's.

You have very unrealistic assumptions and expectations.



To: redfish who wrote (63950)10/29/2004 1:41:52 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
now they drag out an Army officer to say he took them.


Important clue:
He said he took them on which date?