Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (149820)	10/29/2004 3:04:49 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Ask the families of those who died in Iraq as a result of these weapons not beng secured -- perhaps they will share your uproariously "LOL" laughter and perhaps they will consider all of this just more fair game for official "denial" -- then again, perhaps they won't.

To: jlallen who wrote (149820)	10/29/2004 3:24:08 PM
From: Michael Watkins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You are grasping at straws. Is that how you practice law? I'm so disillusioned, here I thought arguing a case was about facts. Well the fact, Jack, is that the FOX news piece answers nothing. WASHINGTON — A U.S. Army officer came forward Friday to say a team from his 3rd Infantry Division took about 250 tons of munitions and other material from the Al-Qaqaa (search) arms-storage facility soon after Saddam Hussein's regime fell in April 2003. Explosives were part of the load taken by the team, but Major Austin Pearson was unable to say what percentage they accounted for. The material was then destroyed, he said. 1. Munitions and other material. They took tons of METAL out of there. They did not take tons of "explosives" out of there, because... 2. They can't even acknowledge how much raw material they took. Could have been one drum or one stick of TNT for all we know. Had he specific knowledge that furthered his "case", he would have said so.