SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AK2004 who wrote (209289)10/29/2004 4:07:34 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572777
 
"It seems that no one argues that there were some explosives there after US took over"

True. But that is obscuring the point. It's not that there were explosives there. It's that there was a particular type of very dangerous plastic explosive. At least some were there, complete with seals, on April 18th. The munitions that were destroyed on April 13th did not have seals. In addition, the 250 tons contained stuff that weren't just explosives according to the Major. Given that munitions means anything from bullets to a MOAB, there is a lot of room there to play...



To: AK2004 who wrote (209289)10/29/2004 4:53:00 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572777
 
What about these photos.
kstp.com

How would they move the explosives out?

TP