Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (209294)	10/29/2004 4:20:39 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575523

> Even if this Pearson is right, what happened to the other 180 tons? 160 tons. 320,000 lbs. There were 380 tons; Pearson claims he removed 200 tons.....probably by himself since no one else seems to know what the hell he's talking about. 380-200 = 180 tons. This quantity of explosive is totally insignificant in the overall scheme of things. 180 tons is insignificant? Who are you fooling? If you make the argument these were special, ultra-destructive explosives, then they were WMD by any reasonable definition (or at the very least, components of WMD) which obviously justifies our presence there. That was a small component of what they were. Most were regular munitions........stuff that the insurgents could use against our guys. There is no argument. Its pure, unadulterated incompentence!