SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kumar who wrote (82141)10/31/2004 2:17:12 AM
From: mistermj  Respond to of 793883
 
A Long Shadow
Bush v. Gore roiled a nation. It's back—and, given Rehnquist's health, looming larger than ever

By Debra Rosenberg
NewsweekNov. 2 issue - At a reunion with his former law clerks in May, Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens was in a reflective mood. As more than a hundred clerks and other guests dined in an elegant room at the court, the oldest justice rose to make a speech. Stevens quickly invoked one of the most painful moments in the court's recent history—Bush v. Gore, the controversial 5-4 decision that handed George W. Bush the presidency in 2000. He paid tribute to the hardworking clerks who had weathered the electoral storm, inviting them to stand while the crowd applauded enthusiastically. Stevens has never backed away from his stinging dissent in the case. And his homage to the clerks is just one signal that, even four years later, Bush v. Gore is still on the justices' minds.
[more]
msnbc.msn.com



To: kumar who wrote (82141)10/31/2004 6:02:15 AM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793883
 
I had to say something Kumar.

I found your statement:

If you have not yet made up your mind, please do not vote.

appalling.

The last four words are a recipe for the destruction of America.

Just in case I was not perfectly clear the first time...I was disagreeing with your advice.
uw