Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RealMuLan who wrote (55270)	11/1/2004 8:44:08 AM
From: brian h	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

""All overseas reports said there were >10,000 were involved. But until I read something written by a person who lives in Wanzhou, and was right there when the incidence happened, and he said it was true that many people were there, but 99% were just looking, without any action."" First, I am not saying this is a case that is even worthy of reporting. And I believe 99% people were actually looking. I know China media are excellent in covering this sort of cases. :-) They just do not cover it or make it a junior case (TienAnnMan incident was a good example. SARS problem was a good one too until it can not be controlled from the official media.). And you as if you are a reporter for China media reported to us otherwise. Could you spot the person (the source) you mentioned? I will visit and understand myself - just for the entertainment purpose. BH