Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: brian1501 who wrote (209672)	11/1/2004 2:35:58 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575761

Yup. That was exactly the attitude of the right back then. Why take the chance they might loose the election the second time around. However, its that unwillingness to be sure that has haunted Bush's election since 2000. j Ted, that is just plain stupid. You can't make it up as you go. The votes were in, they were recounted. Bush won. Having a second election day just because your guy didn't win is a crock. Brian, let me repeat..........you hear there are voter improprieties.....miscount of ballots in key GOP counties, ballots 'lost' that turn out to be Dem. votes, Dem. registered voters told they are not registered at polling places etc. Would you not want at a minimum a total recount if not a new election? I know that's what GOP attorneys are saying now about this election. Revote 1992 for any reason (just make one up...doesn't matter if it's real or not to you guys) and Clinton was never president. Would you like that? Would you think that was fair? To think, all those years Clinton really wasn't MY president and I thought he was. I guess I missed out on 8 years of hate. Sorry, Brian, but your cohorts more than made up for your lack of hate. There was so much hate directed at Clinton by the GOP they could have bottled it and sold it on the open market. ;~) ted