SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : John Kerry for President? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Oeconomicus who wrote (3287)11/1/2004 9:37:46 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 3515
 
That is worth posting again:

Right Leader, Right Time
Wall Street Journal
By TOMMY FRANKS
November 1, 2004; Page A14

The decision we make tomorrow will have a greater impact on the security of our country than any presidential election in my memory. America is at war on a scale unmatched in scope and importance since World War II. The threat today isn't monolithic like Hitler's Germany or Hirohito's Japan -- or bin Laden's al Qaeda of the '90s. But it's just as deadly, with diverse cells in 60 countries, linked by ideology and hatred. The war is global, complex and lethal, and the fundamental choice we must make is whether we fight that war offensively, by pursing the terrorists relentlessly around the world, or defensively, by waiting for them to strike again on American soil. There's no third choice. We cannot play for a tie. America did not create terrorism, terrorists did. And now we must wage war until we win -- no half measures, no equivocation, no "global test."

John Kerry recently suggested that he'd be satisfied if terrorism were rolled back to the point where it was a "nuisance." Terrorism was never merely a nuisance. Terrorists have been killing Americans for more than two decades. The problem is that we chose to do something about it only in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. The bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983; the first World Trade Center attack in 1993; the killing of our airmen at Khobar Towers in 1996; the bombings of our embassies in East Africa in 1998; and the attack on the USS Cole in 2000 -- these were not a "nuisance." They were deadly acts of war. The president of the United States must recognize the difference.

I know from firsthand experience that George W. Bush understands this reality. As commander of the Allied Forces in the Middle East, I worked with him as we laid out a strategy and reviewed operations. I came away from every meeting, every conversation, impressed by his consistency, his honesty, and his character. He does not hesitate, but neither does he rush to judgment. His decisions are based on the best information available. He respects the military and trusts the judgments of our serving military leaders. At each step of planning, he asked me directly whether I had the resources I needed to accomplish each mission. Yet his desire for thoroughness never led to wavering. I knew I could count on him to have the steadiness and patience to see the mission through -- and so did my subordinate commanders.

President Bush's leadership has come under attack by Sen. Kerry, who accuses the president of "incompetence" in pursuing the war on terror. With the release of the latest Osama bin Laden tape, Sen. Kerry has once again attempted to capitalize on Americans' most urgent security concerns. The notion that we "outsourced" our mission at Tora Bora is completely wrong. The Afghan forces at Tora Bora were working in concert with the best fighting forces America has to offer. In addition, the Afghan troops had a long history of opposing the Taliban and fighting for freedom in their own country.

This past week we also saw Sen. Kerry pounce on news stories about the Al Qaqaa facility in Iraq. Those stories first said 380 tons of high explosives were missing, presumed taken after our soldiers were on the scene. Now it turns out the story is more complicated. We don't know how many munitions were stored there when the war began. And we don't know when the munitions that are gone were taken. What we do know is that our forces have seized or destroyed more than 400,000 tons of munitions and explosives -- weapons that Saddam Hussein controlled. If Sen. Kerry's view had prevailed, we wouldn't be arguing about 380 tons of munitions; Saddam would still be in control of all 400,000 -- and potentially much more.

We still need to gather more information about the missing munitions. And, true to form, President Bush will gather the facts and respond appropriately. I respect his thoughtfulness, and his willingness to work with our generals to develop strategy -- strategy based on analysis and experience, not media headlines. All due respect to the media, that's not the way to win a war.

I don't know Sen. Kerry's plan for victory. But I do know that his criticism of the military conduct of our global war on terrorism disrespects our troops. I also know that he cannot lead troops to victory in a war when he's made it perfectly clear that he doesn't support the cause. And he cannot attract more international support for this cause when he denigrates the allies who are helping us.

President Bush understands that destroying terrorism requires a consistent, committed effort on a global scale. And he knows we need the help of other nations committed to freedom. Since Sept. 11, 2001, he has built the largest coalition in history. And the mission determined the coalition; the coalition did not determine the mission. With the help of these allies, we have made remarkable progress in the last three years: 50 million people are free, two regimes that sponsored terror are gone, and America is safer. But much remains to be done. As voters consider their choice, they must think about how America will continue to confront challenges to our freedom. Winning the war against terrorism demands responsible, unwavering leadership. George W. Bush is a leader.

Gen. Franks, until recently director of Central Command, is author of "American Soldier" (Regan, 2004) and a member of Veterans for Bush.



To: Oeconomicus who wrote (3287)11/1/2004 9:38:15 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 3515
 
Cheney predicts Bush will 'carry Hawai'i'

By Derrick Depledge
Advertiser Capitol Bureau

Vice President Dick Cheney, speaking to thousands of cheering Republicans late last night at the Hawai'i Convention Center, made a final appeal to Hawai'i voters to re-elect President Bush tomorrow.

"On Tuesday I have a feeling we're going to surprise a lot of people back on the Mainland," Cheney said. "We're going to carry Hawai'i."

The rally was the climax of an unprecedented focus on Hawai'i before a presidential election, with Republicans and Democrats sending high-level figures over the weekend to influence voters and capture the state's four electoral votes.

Hawai'i voters have chosen Republican presidential candidates only twice since statehood, but after state polls indicated the race here could be close, both parties added Hawai'i to the dozen or so states that could tip the election. The last national USA Today-CNN-Gallup Poll had Bush slightly ahead of Sen. John Kerry for the popular vote and the two tied after projecting how undecided voters would choose.

With a lei draped over his sport coat and his wife, Lynne, and Gov. Linda Lingle standing nearby, Cheney said Bush has shown the strength and leadership the nation needs to win the war on terrorism.

"We are standing just a few miles from Pearl Harbor, the site of a sudden attack ... Three years ago, America faced another sudden attack," Cheney told a crowd estimated by local GOP officials at between 5,000 and 7,000.

Cheney said that "the clearest, most important difference in this campaign is simple to state: President Bush understands the war on terror and has a strategy for winning it. John Kerry does not."

Although the crowd was partisan, Cheney, recognizing Hawai'i's Democratic history, reached out to undecided voters. "It doesn't matter which party you belong or who you have voted for in the past, we're asking for your support," he said.

Earlier yesterday, Sen. John Edwards, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, sharply criticized Cheney and Bush and said the Democrats have a better vision on healthcare and education for Hawai'i voters.

"The vice president, first, is part of the first administration in over 70 years to lose jobs for America," the North Carolina Democrat told The Advertiser in a telephone interview from Columbus, Ohio. "Second, he has consistently sided with big drug companies, big insurance companies, big HMOs, against the interests of the people of Hawai'i. And that's one of the reasons healthcare costs have skyrocketed and so many people have lost their healthcare coverage.

"It's basically an issue of whose side are you on."

Hawaiian issues noted

Edwards repeated his and Kerry's support for a Native Hawaiian federal recognition bill that has been held up in Congress since 2000. The bill would recognize Hawaiians as an indigenous people, similar to American Indians and Native Alaskans, and would establish a process for Hawaiian sovereignty.

The Bush administration has not taken a position on the bill, and several Republicans in Congress believe it would give special preferences to people based on their race.

"Both of us believe that it's important to preserve the culture and the language of Native Hawaiians," Edwards said. "We believe in the right for self-determination. There is a unique language and culture that it's important that it be recognized.

"The bottom line is we support it because we believe it's the right thing to do."

Miriam Hellreich, a GOP national committeewoman from Hawai'i, said she senses the same spirit and optimism among Republicans as she did in 1984 when Ronald Reagan won Hawai'i as part of a national landslide. The only other Republican presidential candidate to win Hawai'i was Richard Nixon in 1972. Nixon campaigned in the Islands in 1960, when he narrowly lost to John F. Kennedy.

Cheney's visit is a coup for Lingle, who is getting national attention for her popularity in what has been thought of as a solidly Democratic state.

"I think it's going to mean a lot to the people of Hawai'i that he cares enough about us to come here," Hellreich said. "It's definitely going to motivate a lot of people who are undecided. This time, their vote counts."

While the Hawai'i polls caught many by surprise, several state and national political operatives said they had been detecting a close race from internal polls over the past few months.

Neil Newhouse, a national Republican strategist who did polling in urban Honolulu in mid-September for Republican congressional candidate Dalton Tanonaka, believes Bush has the edge. "It's apparent that the intervening six weeks have done little to convince Hawai'i voters otherwise," he said. "Simply put, John Kerry has failed to make his case to the state's voters."

Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawai'i, who campaigned for Kerry this past weekend on O'ahu and Maui and will be on the Big Island today, said he believes Kerry has the momentum. He said the close polls may have inspired Democrats. "It sometimes helps," the senator said. "It really fires up your people."

Cheney's appearance followed a Democratic rally on Friday night at Farrington High School with former Vice President Al Gore and Kerry's oldest daughter, Alexandra. Kerry and former President Bill Clinton did telephone interviews with Hawai'i television stations last week, and national Democrats poured more than $200,000 in advertising into the state over the past several days.

Last stop in a long day

Cheney stepped off his plane at Hickam Air Force Base last night at 10:30 p.m. It was the day's final stop after campaign appearances in Ohio, Michigan, Iowa and New Mexico. He was flying to Colorado right after the Honolulu appearance.

Lingle and Lt. Gov. James "Duke" Aiona greeted the vice president and his wife at the air base.

Waiting for them across the street from the convention center were about 200 protesters, some dressed in costumes such as the Grim Reaper and Darth Vader.

They carried anti-Bush and anti-Cheney signs and chanted, "Go home Cheney," as the vice president's motorcade rolled up to the convention center.

Inside the convention center, which volunteers decorated with faux palm trees and rainbow-colored and red-white-and-blue balloons, several people said Lingle's ties to the president paid off at a critical time.

"I really like the connection there. It's good for our state," said Boxley Diggs, a retired Air Force veteran who lives in Mililani.

Katie Wida, a gymnastics coach from Makaha, wants to believe that Bush has a real chance in Hawai'i tomorrow. "It's so close," Wida said. "I can't imagine anyone being undecided right now."



To: Oeconomicus who wrote (3287)11/1/2004 10:02:52 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3515
 
Schilling Makes Surprise Stop for BushInjured Boston Red Sox Pitching Ace Curt Schilling Makes Surprise Appearance for Bush

First lady Laura Bush, left, sits with Boston Red Sox Pitcher Curt Schilling, right, at campaign rally at ABX Air Hangar Monday, Nov. 1, 2004 in Wilmington, Ohio. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
The Associated Press

WILMINGTON, Ohio Nov 1, 2004 — Boston Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling made a surprise appearance Monday morning with President Bush, limping to the stage to give Bush a strong endorsement.

Schilling won Game 2 of the World Series and Game 6 of the American League championship series with his ankle stitched to protect a torn sheath around a tendon. He was expected to undergo surgery this week, and had canceled an appearance with Bush on Friday.

Monday morning, he wore a protective boot over the ankle as he and his wife made their way to the stage inside an airplane hangar.

The ace pitcher said Bush was a commander in chief who will ensure troops "have everything they need to get the job done, a leader who believes in their mission and honors their service, a leader who has the courage and the character to stay on the offense against terrorism until the war is won."

"On Tuesday, we need you to get out and vote. We need you to get your friends and neighbors out to vote tell them you're voting for President Bush and get them on board, too," Schilling said. "I know everybody wants to be on a winning team, and there's plenty of room on this bandwagon."



To: Oeconomicus who wrote (3287)11/1/2004 10:43:43 AM
From: Patricia Trinchero  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3515
 
I'm not one of those scared sheep that stand behind a chickenhawk and expect him to protect me.

If Bush and I were in battle together I guarantee he would be hiding behind me!!!!!

I'll take Kerry thankyou!



To: Oeconomicus who wrote (3287)11/1/2004 8:53:31 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3515
 
BREAKING -- 6th Circuit Allows Republican Challengers at Ohio Polling Places!!
Fox News ^ | 11-01-04 | cww

Posted on 11/01/2004 5:50:49 PM PST by CWW

In a blow to Democratic fraudulent registration efforts in Ohio, the 6th Circuit just reversed two Ohio Federal District Courts that had ruled unconstitutional the Ohio statute that allowed either party to place poll watchers/challengers in each polling place. As a result, Republicans can now place poll watchers and challengers in heavily democratic polling places to challenge any improper registrations and to insure that voter IDs match their registrations. Democrats are livid, because now they cannot commit fraud in hiding.