Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth V. McNutt who wrote (654891)	11/1/2004 2:18:08 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

ok...we'll go with 80,000 to 120,000 Iraqi civilians killed then. What range would you consider TOO MUCH? It's already there.

To: Kenneth V. McNutt who wrote (654891)	11/1/2004 3:36:08 PM
From: E. T.	Respond to of 769670

What's your estimate?eom

To: Kenneth V. McNutt who wrote (654891)	11/1/2004 4:25:54 PM
From: ThirdEye	Respond to of 769670

Granted that estimate cannnot be accurate. But just how many civilian deaths are acceptable before we say this is entirely unacceptable. By some more reliqable estimates we are already up to 16-20K. Do we, like, say 25001 is one too many? We are destroying Iraq in order to "save" it by some tortured neocon definition of what's the "right" thing to do. And what if Iraq descends into civil war, not out of the question at all, the results will dwarf what has happened so far and the blood will be on Cheney and Wolfowitz' hands.