SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (209841)11/1/2004 4:52:01 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1577900
 
Ted, BTW staying in a country and fighting for ten years because you THINK it may end up with a democracy is not a good thing.

What if the alternative is to put up with more Islamic fundamentalism for the next twenty years?

No, fighting Islamic fundamentalism, and not Iraqi insurgents.

P.S. - No need to respond. I realize I'm just another "fearmonger" to you.

Not a fearmongerer, but rather someone misguided. ;~)

ted



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (209841)11/1/2004 9:14:36 PM
From: SilentZ  Respond to of 1577900
 
>What if the alternative is to put up with more Islamic fundamentalism for the next twenty years?

What if it isn't?

-Z



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (209841)11/1/2004 11:43:41 PM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577900
 
What if the alternative is to put up with more Islamic fundamentalism for the next twenty years?

Islamic fundamentalism comes from Saudi Arabia, and the second country where it is most common in state sanctioned activity is Iran. If it pops up in Iraq, the coalition is to blame because it was near non-existant under Saddam. He wouldn't even let the Shias undergo their annual religious pilgramiges.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News