SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : 5spl -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LPS5 who wrote (1636)11/2/2004 6:05:25 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2534
 
Hate to say it, but I think you're wrong. Heavy voter turn out. More poorly informed voters. With lower intelligence, less able to work out the consequences of events. Kerry voters. If I have to call it, Kerry, but close.



To: LPS5 who wrote (1636)11/2/2004 6:17:38 PM
From: HairBall  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2534
 
LPS5: From your mouth to God's ears...gg

LG



To: LPS5 who wrote (1636)11/2/2004 6:51:47 PM
From: Bill Ulrich  Respond to of 2534
 
The online bookies had a small margin for Bush earlier today. Now they're leaning towards Kerry. From Ireland-based tradesports.com

Bid Ask Last Vol Chge
GWBUSH2004 29.9 30.0 29.9 1.2m -23.1
KERRY2004 70.1 71.5 70.6 143.2k +23.6



To: LPS5 who wrote (1636)11/2/2004 7:04:40 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2534
 
Let me expand on and partly retract that.

There is some correlation between intelligence and income, but it's not strong.
It is partly because intelligence test scores predict years of education so well that they also predict occupational status, and even income to a smaller extent
...............................................................
We can also begin with IQ scores, which by themselves account for about one-fourth of the social status variance and one-sixth of the income variance.
...............................................................
It is partly because intelligence test scores predict years of education so well that they also predict occupational status, and even income to a smaller extent

michna.com

The heavier the turn-out, the higher percentage of poor in it. There aimply are more of them and they generally are less likely to vote anyway and the wealthy are more likely to normally vote.

Now if you are poor, who are you more likely to favor? Democrats, because "soak the rich" is their standard battle cry. If they do so, the poor can get the benefit of the money extracted from them.

(In fact, it seems ultimately the middle class is what gets taxed, but the result, from the POV of the poor, is the same.)



To: LPS5 who wrote (1636)11/2/2004 11:03:22 PM
From: WaveSeeker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2534
 
Nice call... OH and FL tracking below Gore #s for Dems.



To: LPS5 who wrote (1636)11/10/2004 2:39:49 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2534
 
wow, LP....

i missed this prediction

superb analysis...

i had read apres election that the early exit polls had something like 60% women respondents



To: LPS5 who wrote (1636)11/20/2004 1:39:16 AM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2534
 
Wow, that's inane.

Tom