Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The 2004 Bigmouth Election Challenge -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (499)	11/3/2004 2:52:33 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Respond to of 588

If Bush had lost, you wouldn't have had post 499 for me to respond ... "Grub!!"

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (499)	11/3/2004 3:07:16 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 588

I don't understand either making or taking the challenge. I don't understand being certain about an election, either. If the Democrats had run a candidate with an iota of charisma, another iota of 'naturalness,' and a wife that wasn't a PR disaster, they would have won easily, imo.

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (499)	11/3/2004 3:15:06 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 588

quahog is a commie pinko, but in a good way. Well, Ben is a Nazi brownshirt, but in a nice way. So there! The unfortunate thing is that not enough of the right people took the challenge. That is, the really BIG Bigmouths, on bothh sides of the political spectrum. Yeah. So it didn't work, didn't accomplish its purpose, and let's forget the whole matter. Had CYBER, Tom Watson, AS, and Chinu had the cojones to step up to the plate, I'd be the first to insist that Dave terminate them if they dared show up. You, Quahog, and Po are a whole 'nuther matter. And don't get teary eyed about that or I'll pull up a few of your stock trades that didn't work! :-)