Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why do we still have the Electoral College? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: deep_rough who wrote (28)	11/4/2004 7:31:12 PM
From: sandintoes	Respond to of 60

That is a very good point.

To: deep_rough who wrote (28)	11/4/2004 8:19:43 PM
From: Jon Khymn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 60

Let not over do it Gary, there were little more than 10MM votes counted in California. Are you saying half could be fraud? Let's try to be little more realistic, I would say not even 50,000 votes are fraud in Calif. If it is, we need to change the system. Ok let's double that number to 100,000. And that's about 1% of the total votes in Calif. And that's less than 0.1% of total vote of 116MM. Now compare that to 55 EC vote out of 538, that is whopping 10%. Are you going to say "Butt, butt, still 100,000 is a bigger number than 55, so I am sure it is more important to block 100,000 illegal vote than blocking 55 illegal electoral vote, duh..."