Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (55586)	11/5/2004 1:35:47 AM
From: smolejv@gmx.net	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Message 20708079 Here's a sorted list People Marks Ign. Bans ign./Marked Ilmarinen 12 113 6 942% Tiger Paw 42 63 3 150% Killer Clown 26 36 8 138% jlallen 54 66 12 122% GST 28 33 1 118% BubbaFred 14 14 4 100% Ray Duray 192 164 19 85% Box by river 66 49 1 74% Pearly Button 21 14 1 67% Snowshoe 14 8 0 57% Carranza2 20 11 4 55% Yiwu the Mad 36 17 0 47% Cobalt Blue 106 41 0 39% Neocon 51 14 0 27% Dr Id 39 10 1 26% Jill 88 20 2 23% Dolinar 24 5 0 21% Mqurice 247 41 0 17% Jacob Snyder 262 35 0 13% EricL 144 15 0 10% Uncle Frank 443 19 2 4% Unclewest 340 11 1 3% Jay Chen 435 10 0 2% Janice Shell 527 11 0 2% Richard Harmon 494 2 0 0% correlations: Marks Ign. Bans Ign/marked People Marks 1.00 Ignored (0.16) 1.00 Thread Bans (0.18) 0.80 1.00 ignore/Marked (0.32) 0.54 0.28 1.00 the one significant correlation is ignore vs bans (check). Nothing significantly correlating with marks - we mark and forget I think... Cautionary note: what's the population we're talking about anyway? Just tails and no middle ground I'd say (g)