SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike Johnston who wrote (25023)11/4/2004 10:21:07 PM
From: SkywatcherRespond to of 306849
 
wall street republicans can't get their hands on them....
so they are salivating at "privatizing social security"
Fresh capital is like FRESH MEAT to the VULTURES
CC



To: Mike Johnston who wrote (25023)11/4/2004 10:31:19 PM
From: Jim McMannisRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
RE:"Why not just make all savings accounts tax free?"

They already did...they don't pay enough to have to pay much tax.

You can get $500k tax free out of a house every two years. Why save?

In reality the tax code needs a major overhaul.



To: Mike Johnston who wrote (25023)11/4/2004 11:12:40 PM
From: THRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Mike,

"with thousands of pages of new legislation"

That sounds very good for those in government.

And, we need all these new financial instruments, as they will create jobs for all those losing theirs in the mortgage and investment services -g/ng-

Yes, big storm coming. I do not know when, but I think soon.

I actually favor penalties on retirement accounts. If not for penalties, I think consumers would have sucked them dry already. I saw an article this week about a new credit card that lets you borrow against your 401K. I don't think that is such a good idea.

With that said, I would settle for 25% of the SS I've paid to date, if I could control it. That 25% is much better than 0% in 25 more years.

Good Trading

TH