Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (20316)	11/5/2004 12:41:54 AM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

I don't understand why people who are perfectly likable and reasonable in some respects insist on following such ridiculous lines of thinking.

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (20316)	11/5/2004 12:43:11 AM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Read this Garbage flachfilm.com Then send them a nice little note helenereveliere@ascommunication.fr

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (20316)	11/5/2004 7:53:00 AM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Message 20736142

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (20316)	11/5/2004 9:14:51 AM
From: mph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

gee, and here all the other lunatics insist it was a Diebold conspiracy. It is hilarious that none of these people will even consider whether the exit polling was flawed in some manner. Instead, they assume the exit polling was perfectly done and that, since the actual outcome didn't match, the votes were not properly counted. Why is everything a friggin' conspiracy? Frankly, it's a lot easier to believe that the exit polling was flawed. Plenty of opportunity for human error/interference, and yes, deliberate efforts to skew results. Too many fingers in that pie.