SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FaultLine who wrote (151182)11/9/2004 10:48:14 AM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
U.S. Will Pursue Aggressive Foreign Policy - Powell
2 hours, 28 minutes ago Top Stories - Reuters


LONDON (Reuters) - President Bush (news - web sites) has a fresh mandate to pursue an "aggressive" foreign policy, Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites) said on Tuesday.

story.news.yahoo.com



To: FaultLine who wrote (151182)11/10/2004 3:15:06 AM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The goals of our foreign "policy" are becoming increasingly unclear to me. I see us destroying a medium-sized city with 100,000 plus civilians trapped in a bombardment that cannot possibly pretend to distinguish civilians from combatants -- and I must ask, what does anybody really expect to accomplish with this? I clipped an assessment of the storming of Fallujah that asks a similar set of questions in a more lucid manner.

slate.msn.com

FL, do you not wonder at the readiness we demonstrate to kill without there seeming to be any outcome that we would find acceptable? Are we to kill long enough to have a round of voting and then say all is well as we seem to have done in Afghanistan? As an American, do you see a nation with a foreign policy that befits our values and our strategic interests? How many do we need to kill? If we have killed more than 100,000 so far, and that excludes Fallujah, and if we have maimed hundreds of thousands more, and if we have taken dead and wounded of our own approaching ten thousand young men and women, should we not stand up and demand to know what the goal of all of this really can be?



To: FaultLine who wrote (151182)12/1/2004 6:57:50 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Sistani pulls main Shia parties together to dominate Iraq poll

Rory McCarthy in Baghdad
Wednesday December 1, 2004
The Guardian

Iraq's Shia parties have built a powerful political alliance uniting moderates with extremists and seem likely to dominate next month's general election. The coalition, formed in weeks of private negotiations, will put forward a joint list of candidates.
The process has been overseen by Iraq's most revered Shia cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, who has designated aides to unite the diverse Shia parties and to vet the many independent candidates standing with them.

Although he seeks no political role for himself, the influence of the Iranian-born ayatollah will ensure that the government has a deeply religious character and that Islam is a central tenet of the constitution that must be written next year.

Shia politicians are highly organised and intent on holding the elections on time, despite the violence that still grips Iraq and the pressure for a delay from their Sunni and Kurdish political rivals. If they succeed it will be the first time for centuries that the Shia have run the country, achieving what many have come to regard as their birthright.

"We are pushing the government and the political parties very hard so that we can have elections on time," said Jawad al-Maliki, a cultural historian who spent 25 years living in exile and is a senior figure in the large Islamic Dawa party.

"We feel very strongly that this crisis - the coalition forces, the corruption - is all happening because there are no elections in Iraq."

A small committee dominated by Ayatollah Sistani's aides is overseeing the joint list of candidates. On January 30 voters are due to elect 275 members of a national assembly, which will then choose a prime minister and cabinet. The assembly's prime task will be to write a constitution, to be ratified by a second general election at the end of the year.

The list is topped by the leaders of Islamic Dawa and the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution, Ibrahim al-Jaafari and Abdul Aziz al-Hakim. The coalition also includes Ahmad Chalabi, the secular Shia exile who was once a Pentagon favourite to rule post-war Iraq, and representatives of Moqtada al-Sadr, the hardline Shia cleric who has led a series of uprisings against the US occupation.

It is the first sign of rapprochement between the exiles and the opponents of Saddam Hussein who stayed in Iraq.

Others involved include the Fadhila party, a moderate Islamist group opposed to the occupation.

"We want to take the Americans out of our country through negotiations, not by fighting," said its political leader, Nadeem al-Jabbery, a professor of politics at Baghdad University.

"If we don't have elections or an elected government then the Americans will stay and our problems will continue."

Half the list will be party members, the other half independents approved by Ayatollah Sistani. Yesterday an alliance of 38 small Shia parties voiced the first public dissatisfaction with Ayatollah Sistani's plans. Hussein al-Mousawi, spokesman for the Shia Political Council, said the key positions on the Shia list were going to extremist candidates who "believe in the rule of religious clerics".

Notably absent from the list, for now, is Ayad Allawi, the secular Shia who was appointed prime minister by the US in June this year. "The list is not finished yet. We have invited Allawi but we don't know if he will say yes or no," Mr Maliki said.

Some sources say that Ayatollah Sistani is reluctant to have Mr Allawi on the list and believes he is tainted by his close alliance with the US. Some Shia politicians are still uncomfortable with his membership of the Ba'ath party before he defected in the 1970s.

Other parties are forming their own, smaller lists of allied candidates. The two Kurdish parties, dominated by Masood Barzani of the Kurdistan Democratic party, will put in a joint list and may yet form an alliance with Mr Allawi.

Ghazi al-Yawar, the US-appointed president, has formed his own party of Sunni and Shia figures, including several current government ministers, and they will put forward their own list. The most likely candidates for prime minister remain Mr Allawi, Mr Jaafari of Islamic Dawa, and Adil Abdul-Mehdi, the number two in the Supreme Council.

Just two months from the elections it is difficult to identify a specific political programme followed by any of the Shia parties or their coalition. But given Ayatollah Sistani's role and the strong religious character of most of the parties involved, it is clear that Islam will have a key role.

Some will want to introduce an Islamic legal system. Under the temporary constitution supervised by the US occupation authorities earlier this year a compromise was reached: Islam was designated a source for legislation but not the sole source. It is likely that the more conserv ative Shias will want to change that. In the slum areas of eastern Baghdad where Moqtada al-Sadr holds sway there has already been a dramatic Islamisation of society, setting up new religious schools and requiring schoolgirls to cover their hair.

The role of clerics in the new government will also be strongly fought over.

Mr Jabbery, of the Fadhila party, represents a moderate viewpoint but still sees a potential political role for the clergy.

"In this country we would like the Islamic clerics to be outside the system, because they will work much better that way," he said. But he added: "They will keep their eye on the political movements and they can step in at the right time if something really goes wrong or makes them feel they should change things if there is a crisis."

Other parties are still vague about their agenda. The Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution says: "Our programme will adhere to Islamic principles and will be based on Shia support."
guardian.co.uk



To: FaultLine who wrote (151182)12/4/2004 9:36:06 AM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 

UN Talks to Review Where 'Dangerous' Warming Starts

Fri Dec 3,10:43 AM ET Science - Reuters


By Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent

OSLO (Reuters) - A decade after the world pledged to prevent "dangerous" global warming, 194 nations meet next week to review whether rare heatwaves and a fast Arctic thaw may signal that the planet is nearing the brink.



The Dec. 6-17 U.N. talks in Buenos Aires will also seek ways to persuade the United States to rejoin a U.N.-led fight against climate change and also try to involve developing nations like China, India or Brazil.

Ministers will review the U.N.'s 1994 climate change convention, signed by ex-U.S. President Bush (news - web sites), and its goal of limiting greenhouse gases to levels "that would prevent dangerous (human) interference with the climate system."

"You can ask the question of whether changes we have already observed are dangerous," said Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. "It will be a political decision."

The 1990s were probably the warmest decade in a millennium and 1998 the warmest year on record, according to U.N. data. The Kyoto protocol on curbing global warming, due to enter into force on Feb. 16, is the main spinoff of the convention.

An eight-nation report last month showed the Arctic is warming at double the rate of the rest of the globe, threatening livelihoods of indigenous hunters and perhaps driving polar bears to extinction in the wild.

Indigenous groups say the changes are obviously dangerous and, like many governments, say that much deeper cuts in emissions of greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels will be needed when Kyoto runs out in 2012.

"I don't know if it's dangerous but it's out of the pathway the rest of the planet is taking by a factor of two," said Robert Corell, who led the study by 250 scientists.

Another report this week in the journal Nature said that human activities, notably the burning of fossil fuels from cars to power plants, had raised risks of heatwaves like one in Europe in 2003 in which more than 20,000 people died.

LIMIT RISES

The senior U.S. climate negotiator, Harlan Watson, said there was insufficient grounds yet to define "dangerous." "The bulk of the scientific opinion is we just don't know enough to be able to predict impact," he said.

But some want to draw a line in the sand.

The European Union (news - web sites) and some environmental groups want to limit any global temperature rise to 2.0 Celsius (3.6F). Temperatures have risen by 0.6C since the late 1800s.

Alternatively, Pachauri said that nations could set a limit for concentrations of heat-trapping carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which have risen by about 30 percent since the start of the industrial revolution.

President Bush pulled out in 2001 from the 128-nation Kyoto protocol, which seeks to cut greenhouse gas emissions by five percent from 1990 levels by 2012. Bush argued it was too expensive and wrongly excluded developing nations.

And the United States says it has no plans to rejoin the U.N. efforts.

Even so, Bush is not the only one failing under Kyoto. Carbon dioxide emissions by rich nations involved in Kyoto are running 8.4 percent over 1990 levels, environmental group WWF said.



The U.N. Environment Program says that Kyoto will not be enough, merely braking rising temperatures by 0.1C over the course of the 21st century against a forecast rise of 1.4-5.8C. (Additional reporting by Jeff Mason in Brussels)

story.news.yahoo.com



To: FaultLine who wrote (151182)4/2/2005 4:05:04 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Who Will Be Next Pope?
______________________

abcnews.go.com

New Pontiff May Not Be From Italy -- or Even Europe

- As the world mourns the death of Pope John Paul II, a question looms large and near: Who will become the next leader of the Roman Catholic Church?

Vatican watchers have been speculating for years, and while they may disagree on who they think the next pope may be, there is some consensus on the factors that will play in the decision.

Much credence is being given to John Paul's appointment of all but a handful of the 109 cardinals currently eligible to vote in the group that will choose his successor. As a result, some expect the next pontiff will follow very much in the mold of his predecessor.

Vatican watchers also recognize that most of the Catholic Church's growth has come in the Third World -- leading to speculation that the next pope may not be European, much less Italian.

Then there is some consideration being given to the late pope's superstar status as a world leader. The presence of global media certainly means the next pope will have to be personable, multilingual and charismatic -- but there's expected to be some disagreement on if he will have a strong political role.

"This man, John Paul II, has been tremendously active as a world figure. He's been a voice throughout the world, he's the conscience of the world," said the Rev. Vincent O'Keefe, ABC News' consultant on Vatican issues. "Some would say, well, a pope shouldn't be in politics."

Yet papal elections are never easy to handicap. There is a Roman maxim, "He who goes into the conclave as pope comes out a cardinal."

The conclave of cardinals is responsible for electing a pope from their ranks.

Picking a pope is a political game, and various factions in the cardinals' conclave are going to be agitating to control the next holy father's stances, particularly hot-button sexual and doctrinal issues like priestly celibacy and remarriage after divorce.

A Move to Orthodoxy?

With the church still assimilating the changes from the Vatican II conference in the 1960s, such as moving the Mass from Latin to local languages, most Vatican watchers believe the majority of cardinals will back a candidate who, following in the steps of John Paul II, is cautious about changing church policy.

Others say a centrist candidate might ultimately be most appealing. "They'll certainly want nobody who's going to be viewed as polarizing," said the Rev. John Newhouse, editor of the Catholic journal First Things.

Facing the World
Half of the world's Catholics now live in Latin America, and 40 percent of the current Catholic bishops are from the Third World, which means that after the death of the first Polish pope, the cardinals may feel compelled to go beyond Europe.

"There's a much closer ear kept on what the international church is saying. That in itself, I think, is an indication of the church being far less Roman in the narrow sense of meaning mostly Italians leading and heading it up," Cardinal Wilfrid Napier told ABC News.

There are several strong Third World papabili (Italian for "popables" or possible popes), like cardinals Francis Arinze of Nigeria, Jaime Lucas Ortega y Alamino of Cuba, and Dario Castrillon Hoyos of Colombia.

Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez of Honduras, another papabili, told ABCNEWS he expected the field for the next pope to be "very wide open."

"The time will come when a pope will be from Latin America, and the time will come that a pope can come from Africa or from Asia," he said.

John Paul was criticized by many bishops for running a highly centralized church. "I've heard different cardinals say that perhaps what we need is to have more decision-making come from the different nations rather than from the central headquarters in Rome," said the Rev. Michael Fahey, editor of the Catholic quarterly Theological Studies.

"More than anything, they're going to be looking for a pope who is going to respect the authority and the autonomy of the local bishops," said Father Richard McBrien, a Notre Dame theology professor and author of "Lives of the Popes."

The majority of bishops who run dioceses in the conclave have a desire for a more democratic papacy, which may mean the next pope won't be a lifelong Vatican bureaucrat. The Roman Curia, Vatican managers who tend to no local flocks, make up only 20 percent of the cardinalate.

But some dissenters say there's a desire within the episcopate to have a period of consolidation -- which might mean another Italian pope.

The one place the pope is guaranteed not to hail from is the United States. A U.S. pope would carry too much political baggage from the superpower, and would never be accepted by the rest of the world, said Rev. Thomas Reese, author of "Inside the Vatican."

"If someone from the U.S. was elected, people in the Third World would feel that the CIA fixed the election or that Wall Street bought it."

In Search of a Lesser World Figure

While the Catholic Church's profile around the world has grown, there is some dispute over whether or not John Paul's successor will play as large a role.

Many of the cardinals, in fact, would prefer a pope with a bit less energy than John Paul had. The reign of John Paul II has been the seventh-longest in the history of the papacy, and Vatican watchers say the cardinals may look for a shorter-lived pontificate this time.

An older pope might provide the Vatican with a breather, a time to consolidate John Paul II's advances and assimilate the changes of the past 30 years, said Notre Dame's McBrien.

"The question will be whether you want an interim pope who will provide a period of time to assimilate the initiatives of this pontificate, or whether you would want someone with the strong leadership and super-high profile of a John Paul II," said Newhouse.

The cardinals are expected to look for a man in his early 70s, said Reese -- but they'll also be careful not to repeat the experience of John Paul I, who, at age 66 died after 34 days on the papal throne.

Quick Selection Process

If there's one thing Vatican watchers hope for, though, it's for a short conclave.

Since 1831, no conclave has lasted more than four days.

"What kind of credibility would a pope have if it took a week and a half to elect him? What the heck would have happened to the Holy Spirit?" said McBrien.

It may be a tough decision, though. The next pope will be working in the wake of one of the most memorable, well-traveled, well-spoken, prominent church leaders in history.

Copyright © 2005 ABC News Internet Ventures



To: FaultLine who wrote (151182)12/2/2005 12:23:37 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 281500
 
I don't know if you still read SI but your absence is always felt:

Message 21937979



To: FaultLine who wrote (151182)7/31/2007 8:25:37 AM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Some progress of a sort.

presstv.ir

British army to leave N Ireland
Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:27:31
Source: Agencies

British troops were sent to Northern Ireland in 1969.
The British Army is ending its 38-year presence in Northern Ireland, the longest campaign in the army's history, at midnight on Tuesday.

"There will be no fanfare or ceremony to avoid accusations of triumphalism," said Colonel Harber of the 39th Infantry Brigade, "only a private moment of remembrance and absolutely nothing else. "

A total of 763 military personnel were killed during the conflict.

Operation Banner -the Army's support role for the police- has been its longest continuous campaign, with more than 300,000 personnel taking part in it.

A garrison of 5,000 troops will remain but security will be entirely the responsibility of the police. It is intended that the soldiers based in Northern Ireland in future will be deployed in foreign trouble spots, not the streets of Northern Ireland.

British troops were sent to Northern Ireland in 1969 after violent clashes between Catholics and Protestants.