Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (88144)	11/7/2004 6:26:48 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

I had no intention of misleading you, as I have caught Chinu on several indiscretions. That is why I told you that I wasn't sure how to interpret his statement and why I offered another one that was more irrefutable. I considered him a dishonorable person before any statement of his on the subject of lying. It was the boldness of his statements on the subjects that caught my eye. Usually, people like him spend a lot of time calling others liars. I was quite surprised that he would declare his position on lying and this was a follow up of previous comments. I shared one of those with you. The one where he stated that it is ok for him to lie when discussing politics. Feel free to apologise to him if you think it is justified. I can't see it from where I sit. I never call someone a liar who hasn't either confessed or been exposed by irrefutable evidence.

To: E who wrote (88144)	11/7/2004 7:01:09 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 108807

It was not my intention to go off on Chinu but since my integrity seems somewhat challenged here, I feel bound to add another example: To: Jewel_o_the_West who wrote (216) 8/18/2004 5:59:55 PM From: ChinuSFO Read Replies (2) of 381 "You fight evil with evil. Lying is perfectly OK too crush the evil wingnuts." I can not find a speck of sarcasm in this post. It seems very straight forward. The post you are challenging as 'misleading' was a follow up to this one and others. Have you noticed how many people chinu has chosen to ban from his thread in order? He claims that he eliminates people for name calling. Not true in all banning cases and in fact some of his regulars do little other than engage in personal attacks. He bans opposing viewspoints or anyone who challenges him. Lucky for you, you appologized. Its such a sweet place to hang out. I miss it <sarcasm>